Recent comments

  • Fall Is A Great Season in Glacier National Park   5 years 51 weeks ago

    We've had good and bad weather luck visiting Glacier National Park in the fall. In September 2004, we experienced beautiful sunny days. My husband returned last Saturday from a photography trip to Glacier. The weather was cloudy, rainy and snowy his entire visit.

    Visitors who like off-the-beaten-path locations will enjoy the drive (around 13 miles on a gravel road) to the small community of Polebride on Glacier's western edge. Although it's not in the park, the area provides access to Glacier's Kitna Lake and Bowman Lake. And who can resist the baked goods at Polebridge Mercantile? Call ahead to see of Northern Lights Saloon is open for dinner. When my husband was there last weekend, the adults of the community were dressed in turn-of-the century formal clothes in preparation for the Polebridge Prom.

  • Pruning the Parks: Flaming Gorge National Recreation Area Was a National Park for Just Five Years   5 years 51 weeks ago

    The NPS apparently very much wants to keep Curecanti NRA, and currently has a plan out for public comment that would expand Curecanti and calls on Congress to officially designate the NPS manager of the public land surrounding Curecanti's three reservoirs. Curecanti, very likely Colorado's most inferior NPS unit, is managed together with adjacent Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Park.

    Check out the NPS's plan for Curecanti here: http://parkplanning.nps.gov/document.cfm?parkId=48&projectId=11243&documentID=24668

    Curecanti sparks deep passions in many Colorado "water buffalos," who revere the three reservoirs, part of the Aspinall Unit, together as a great monument to late Colorado Congressman Wayne Aspinall, one of the Bureau of Reclamation's most fervent boosters of yore.

  • Pruning the Parks: Flaming Gorge National Recreation Area Was a National Park for Just Five Years   5 years 51 weeks ago

    Congress should complete this excellent decision and divest from the NPS Lake Meredith, Amistad, Curecanti, and the park formerly known as Grand Coulee NRA. The Army Corps actually has an excellent public recreation operation that can take some of these sites and the USFS the rest. Get the NPS out of managing reservoirs with little else to offer besides simple water-based recreation. (I will have to give in to places like Glen Canyon, North Cascades, and Lake Mead where the surrounding holdings are extensive and worthy natural and cultural resources).

  • Pruning the Parks: Flaming Gorge National Recreation Area Was a National Park for Just Five Years   5 years 51 weeks ago

    It makes me wonder if other National Recreation Areas should be transferred to the forest service. The whole debate about recreation vs. preservation continues to rear its ugly head. Maybe recreation doesn't belong in the list of NPS missions and such areas should be transferred out.

    Just a thought.

    ==========================================

    My travels through the National Park System: americaincontext.com

  • How To Buy National Park-Related Gifts Without Leaving Home   5 years 51 weeks ago

    New park ornaments have arrived at Inner Peace Designs. Zion and Death Valley National Parks were just added to the short list this American company produces. Mount Rushmore, Grand Canyon, and Crater Lake just to name a few others they carry. They must have a contract with the National Parks Service to do these. Very nice detail. Keep an eye out for these in gift stores in the parks. To view them go to www.innerpeacedesigns.net I own a Grand Canyon ornament and I receive comments all the time. Eveyone asks me to buy on next time I visit. I think there are nicer than painted Christmas balls!!!

  • Uranium Exploratory Drilling Near Grand Canyon National Park is Halted Pending a Full Environmental Review   5 years 51 weeks ago

    Another environmental impact study? And who decided this? The person getting paid for the study? The Grand Canyon and all surrounding area for miles and miles and miles, have been environmental impact studied to death. All another study would do is keep the people with letters after their name in salaries. Try gleaning info from the previous studies; you would probably be amazed at the money saved, and the knowledge already gathered for your use.

  • Fall Into Grand Canyon of the Yellowstone Kills California Woman   5 years 51 weeks ago

    its been a year since this incident. has anyone heard anything about how her family is doing? I was an aquaintane of Charlotte's. I didn't know her very well but I've always wondered how her family is and if there was a memorial service for her.

  • A Florida Keys National Park? Good Conservation or Florida Bail-out?   5 years 51 weeks ago

    Maybe, the area is question should be bought by the BLM and/or the State.

  • Are There Really 391 Units in the National Park System? You Won’t Think So After You Read This!   5 years 51 weeks ago

    Sometimes Just coming up a a name for a park can be a problem. For Example, At my Park, Boston Harbor Islands, its very name has become an issue. At first look, the park acts and feels very much like a National Recreational Area but it is called officially a National Park Area ( it is a Recreational Area legally), why? Because every island in the park was used as concertation camps for Native Americians early in our history and their expericence was anything but Recreational, so what do you call the place.

    I believe that this issue has happened at many other parks and may be at the heart of the problem with designations and in turn the number of NPS units.

  • Are There Really 391 Units in the National Park System? You Won’t Think So After You Read This!   5 years 51 weeks ago

    None of these non-NPS administered National Monuments are counted in the National Park System 391-tally, of course. Still, the administrative ambiguity does add an additional layer of confusion. Traveler is going to take up the topic of designation confusion in a future article. In this one we tried to stay focused on the count per se.

  • Are There Really 391 Units in the National Park System? You Won’t Think So After You Read This!   5 years 51 weeks ago

    And don't forget the 'National Monuments' that aren't administered by the National Park Service. The BLM administers fifteen 'national monuments' in eight western states, and according the the BLM website, there are 'national monuments' that are administered by the Forest Service and the Fish & Wildlife Service as well.

    For me, this just adds to the confusion surrounding just how many 'national parks' (general term) there are.

  • Uranium Exploratory Drilling Near Grand Canyon National Park is Halted Pending a Full Environmental Review   5 years 51 weeks ago

    Finally, a clear win for proceeding the correct way, that is, performing due diligence environmental and public reviews before allowing potentially damaging and irreversible activities. Hats off to the organizations and individuals who took the legal action required to prevent the Forest Service from doing as they please. It's a shame that legal action is often necessary to force government agencies to follow standard procedure yet, thankfully, when won, these actions (typically and) ultimately benefit the general public and future generations. I, for one, am confident that this country will do just fine without exploiting such beautiful and sensitive lands.

  • Are There Really 391 Units in the National Park System? You Won’t Think So After You Read This!   5 years 51 weeks ago

    Interesting about Charles Pinckney. From the day they first opened the place to the public in the early 90's, that park has been a staple of the local high school history class field trip circuit. On my first trip there, probably back in 1993, the then-undeveloped park was conducting an extensive archaeological dig on the grounds of Snee Farm, and we got a bit of an education on sweetgrass basket weaving from an old woman in a rocking chair. To my uneducated eyes at the time, it was a fascinating experience that certainly stands out as one of the more memorable field trips we took in high school. Having visited there in recent years, I've been much less impressed because the whole enterprise seemed rather pointless for a lack of "tangible history," so to speak. The Charleston area is awash in "tangible" history, all of it worth more than one visit, but Charles Pinckney NHS never seemed to live up to the standard.

  • Grand Canyon Railway May Expand Rail Service to the South Rim at Grand Canyon National Park   5 years 51 weeks ago

    We took the train at the end of June (2008). It was wonderful. My 82 year old Aunt, her niece and myself loved coming back to the Grand Canyon area via the
    train (instead of by car the first time we saw the canyon). It was clean, on time and a pleasure to ride. The live entertainment (wild west show before, singing cowboys on the way to the rim and the "robbery"
    by Cowboy Bandits on the way back) was a favorite of all.

    I agree about the quality of the employee - our guide - came to visit the area and decided to stay. She was perfect. Warm, caring and fun. Very knowledgeable
    and kept us focused (especially not to miss our departure time).

    Not sure of the above post about the loss of the steam locomotives. When we went, they used the diesel one due to mechanical problems that had pulled the
    steam locomotive just the week before.

    I hope their recent experiment with the recent September Sunset Limited was a great success. It provided evening guests with live Jazz Music, appetizers, room to dance
    and a party at the rim. And then, they brought you back the same evening.

    For families - don't forget they offer a Polar Express Run all through the Holidays. Hear the story, see the village, meet Santa and get a gift! Great fun for everyone!

    Packages are always available to ride one train in, stay at Rim and then return on whatever day you decide to return. As a resident and worker in nearby Sedona, AZ, I
    am always letting people know of the treasure 90 minutes north of us!

  • Are There Really 391 Units in the National Park System? You Won’t Think So After You Read This!   5 years 51 weeks ago

    All those decisions made sense at one time - at least for those who took them. The National Park System is not constructed, it grew to the way it is now. The ideas about individual parks and the system as such became entangled into what can only be described as Gordian knot. Maybe a sharp sword would be a useful tool for the next administration.

  • Heavy Rains and Flooding from Hurricane Ike Remnants Left a Mess at Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore   5 years 51 weeks ago

    Cooperation between the NPS and State authorities is possible. Probably the best example is Redwood National and States Parks in California. There three State parks (dedicated in the 1910s) were connected by Redwood National park in 1968. In 1984 the administration was put together and now the Parks are led by a superintendent from the NPS under shared jurisdiction. It could be done elsewhere as well.

  • Are There Really 391 Units in the National Park System? You Won’t Think So After You Read This!   5 years 51 weeks ago

    Not much to see at Snee Farm, dapster. The Charles Pinckney NHS has been described as a sham (I find it hard to disagree) because it has so little to do with Charles Pinckney and has NO Pinckney era structures. This park would be very high on my list of parks to abolish the first chance we get. How that park ever got established in the first place is still something of a mystery to me. As for Pinckney Castle in Charleston harbor, well, it was abandoned and forlorn before being abolished as a national monument (1951), transferred to the Corps of Engineers, and finally declared surplus federal property (1956) and transferred to the state of South Carolina (which let the Sons of Confederate Veterans manage it for a while). The state of South Carolina owns the island at the moment, and I don't know if you can access the property without special permission. Maybe somebody can enlighten us.

  • Are There Really 391 Units in the National Park System? You Won’t Think So After You Read This!   5 years 51 weeks ago

    To really understand this issue you have to really understand how the National Park Service operates: not like a single government bureau, but like a fast food franchise. Each unit is part of a larger organization that sets basic standards and practices. Beyond that, each franchise manager (park superintendent) interprets the corporate programs to fit local conditions. While ever Social Security office may operate the same, every national park unit does not. Hence, the idea of how many units there are is inherently impossible to determine: there are too many variables. Witness the dozens of titles used for park designations and the haphazard manner in which they are assigned or altered over time. Hence, Congress has never designated what is and is not a park, it has designated the National Park System.

  • Are There Really 391 Units in the National Park System? You Won’t Think So After You Read This!   5 years 51 weeks ago

    Bob, Thanks for the clarification.

    Charles Pinckney National Historic Site is not in Charleston harbor; it's well north of Charleston just off US-17 and not far from Boone Hall Plantation.

    I had mixed the two up. I've been to Boone Hall, and seem to remember signs about "Snee Farm" as well. We stay in the KOA there in Mt. Pleasant whenever we got to Charleston. Might just have to check out Snee Farms next time down there!

    Exactly why did "Castle Pinckney" get delisted? Can one enter the sight now? I plan to vacation in Charleston next summer, and will be boating the Cooper and Ashley daily.

  • Winter Storm Uncovers 19th Century Shipwreck at Cape Cod National Seashore   5 years 51 weeks ago

    Nice written post.

    It is really hard to imagine things.

    We had a same incident near SBL.

  • How Far Should National Park Rangers Go To Safeguard Your Life?   5 years 51 weeks ago

    I think a distinction needs to be made between Seashores and Lakeshores that are isolated from urban areas, and NPS areas like Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore that is an urban park. the Indiana Dunes area has been attracting users for well over a century, primarily from the greater Chicagoland area, all seeking the beautiful beaches, and swimming in Lake Michigan. Management needs of certain parks change with time. Why wasn't INDU established as a recreation area?

    While he never mentioned this desire in the many sound bites he issued during this summer's drownings' press coverage, Superintendent Dillon needs an increase in visitation, because that means an increase in operational budget for sure (which could pay for increased lifeguard coverage). He rightly mentions preserving and protecting the natural resources, yet what is the main resource of this park? The beaches. When do the majority of visitors come to this park? The summer months. So why isn't more money going into the primary visitor experience: beach use, and the resultant obligatory safety personnel needed to protect and educate the visitors?

  • Heavy Rains and Flooding from Hurricane Ike Remnants Left a Mess at Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore   5 years 51 weeks ago

    I just read your articles concerning the confusing counting methods of the NPS, and the Hurricane Ike damage at Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore. I thought I would share some thoughts and information with you.

    The City of Portage will in fact be managing the Portage Lakefront and Riverwalk portion of INDU. The NPS purchased and developed this property, probably the last available portion of Indiana shoreline (unless the steel mills in the area sell off more land...). BUT it is in partnership with the City of Portage: Portage will be mainly responsible for staffing and managing this piece of land. This is indeed a unique partnership, for the similar partnerships would have the NPS managing land purchased by a state or municipality.
    SO, it sits on NPS owned land, but the NPS has given management over to the town in which the land sits. Confusing to say the least.

    Most visitors from within the state of Indiana assume the entire park area is part of the Indiana Dunes State Park, established in the 1920's. Most visitors from outside of Indiana assume the entire park is part of the National Lakeshore, established in the 1960's. While the two parks share very similar names, no real partnership actually exists between the NPS and the Indiana DNR. Most Illinois/ Chicago visitors see the beaches only, not realizing that the beaches are attached to state and national parkland. Then you throw the local tourism marketing concerns into the mix and the confusion gets even worse.

    The new Dorothy Buell Memorial Visitor Center is actually a tourist information distribution center that sits on a state highway outside of the INDU boundaries. The facility is shared by the NPS (somewhat), the Indiana State Department of Natural Resources (barely), and a Porter County, IN tourism marketing organization. While most NPS park visitors that seek out this visitor center assume it is an NPS facility, the NPS only rents office space from the building's actual owners, the Porter County Convention, Recreation, and Visitor Commission. Another "partnership" of sorts, but one that only really benefits the PCCRVC. Walk into this visitor center and you are overwhelmed by county tourism brochures and propaganda; NPS and DNR literature is hidden away in a corner.

    Talk about confusing! Trying to establish an identity that satisfies all of the area concerns will be impossible.

  • Musings From Yellowstone National Park   5 years 51 weeks ago

    I want to see more "white" rangers at the Martin Luther King Jr. National Historic Site in Atlanta. I visited this NPS unit recently and there was nary a honky on the staff to be found. Doesn't diversity cut both ways?

  • Trigger-happy Man Shoots Another Rustling in the Brush   5 years 51 weeks ago

    To follow-up on the analogy of licensed vehicle drivers to CHL holders, one of my major concerns is the fact that in many states it is much easier to obtain permit to carry a concealed deadly weapon than a driver's license. I wonder what the effect would be on vehicle accident rates if we allowed individuals to simply mail in an application, wait a few weeks for a basic background check, and then be mailed a drivers license - without any need to show if they knew anything about the rules of the road, had the ability to safely operate a vehicle, or could even see the road ahead!

    Unfortunately, that's the case in states such as Alabama and Georgia, which have no requirements that individuals packing weapons show they know anything at all about basic laws governing the use of deadly force - or have the ability to hit their intended target instead of an innocent bystander if they decide to use that weapon. Indiana goes a step further - an Indiana CHL can be obtained that's good for the rest of the individual's life - with absolutely no training or demonstration of qualifications. Ol' Joe may be 98 now and blind as the proverbial stone wall - but his CHL is still good for as long as he's alive. If you want to "concealed carry" in Alaska or Vermont, no problem - they don't require a permit at all for a concealed handgun, so the question of either training or even a background check are moot in those states.

    Many states that do have minimal training requirements unfortunately simply give lip-service to the question. Did you ever serve in the military – even 50 years ago? No matter if you haven't touched a gun since then. In Wyoming, that's all that's required to "demonstrate familiarity with a firearm" and qualify for a CHL. In states including Florida, Idaho and Montana, you can qualify for a CHL merely on the basis of "completion of a hunter education or safety course."

    Such courses are a great idea, but they do little to ensure that a person carrying a handgun has even minimal ability to hit his intended target. In some states, such "training" can be conducted via the Internet, followed by as little as four hours of contact with a live instructor - and no requirement that the student ever fire a handgun. The "live firing" portion of some such courses requires a grand total of 12 shots with a .22 rifle - or even an airgun! When something goes bump in the night in the campground, do you want a guy in the site next to you grabbing his semi-automatic pistol on the basis of that "training"? I sure don't!

    Even in states like Texas, which thankfully requires some training for a CHL permit, the requirements are so minimal that they have limited practical value in determining if CHL holders are capable of hitting their intended target during the stress of a crisis situation. I base that observation on nearly 30 years of carrying a firearm as a law enforcement officer - and first-hand knowledge of the amount of time required on a firing range on a regular basis to keep skills at anything approaching an acceptable level. The stringent Texas requirement for hands-on training? One visit to the firing range every 10 years.

    I know some readers will dismiss my opinion, so here are two others from acknowledged gun experts. Massad F. Ayoob, who is widely known in pro-gun circles as a prolific writer and firearms and self-defense instructor, is quoted as follows: "It is reasonable to assume that there will be bystanders present when a defense handgun must be used in public…Your competency with the weapon you carry must be such that you will not fire an accidental or panicky shot into a group of bystanders.... What frightens me most about civilians with guns is that so many of them are incredibly rotten pistol shots...."

    Dave Lauck is a certified armorer and frequent author in firearms and shooting publications. He notes in Tactical Shooter magazine: "A person who buys a handgun in America today is on his own when it comes to learning how to safely use it….No federal law, and very few state or local laws, require that a handgun owner show any competence in how to safely handle, store, or use the gun….Unfortunately, many new shooters are unaware of basic firearms safety, and many trained shooters become complacent in their application."

    Lest some readers take comfort in the fact they live in one of the states that does require at least basic training in use of a handgun - no so fast. Most states honor permits issued by other states under reciprocal agreements. Here's one example: websites of several companies tout the easy availability of Utah CHL's with pitches like these: "Available to residents of ANY state!" "One low-cost permit valid in 27 to 30 states!" "High-energy, 4 to 5-hour class available in many different cities!" (A 4 to 5-hour class - now there's some serious training for you.) And, best of all, "Awesome for those that can't get a permit from their home state!" Isn't it nice to know that some of those folks are probably "carrying concealed" in your state, based on those stringent Utah requirements.

    Yes, some CHL holders are skilled shooters - but in the absence of legal requirements for credible training, there is also an unknown and likely large number of people at the other end of the scale. In short, unlike a driver's license, there is no correlation between possession of a CHL and the proven ability to use a firearm safely.

    This lack of adequate training requirements unnecessarily increases the risks to innocent bystanders if weapons are fired in crowded areas such as campgrounds by nervous urbanites who hear something "rustling in the brush." A Google search will easily find that innocent victims of errant shots fired each year from legally carried handguns greatly outnumber victims of crime in national parks. The trade-off in safety of visitors to our parks by "arming" the general public against the very low risk of crime in those locations simply doesn't withstand analysis.

    A previous poster and I do agree on one point – I wouldn't promote the virtues of anyplace being as "safe as Houston." Recent FBI crime stats show that despite rapid increases in the number of CHL's in Texas, more serious crime occurs in Houston in a typical week than in the entire national park system in a whole year!

  • Are There Really 391 Units in the National Park System? You Won’t Think So After You Read This!   5 years 51 weeks ago

    Thank you, Mr. Janiskee, for this relevant article!

    Your findings reveal the truth behind the federal management of national park areas; indeed the inmates have taken charge of the asylum. The weight of all that bureaucracy dulls--crushes!--reason and logic. Whatever the real answer (how many parks do you think are in the system?), the rhetorical answer is "too many!" Consider that the administration of the entire system costs more than the operation of the 58 "national park" in-name units (the very same bureaucracy that can't provide a realistic or accurate count of actual units under its purview), and you'll realize the system has grown unwieldy.

    Of course, one solution would be to kick the "inmates" out and shut down the "asylum". Each park should be able to stand on its own and provide its own definition of how many units it is (one).