Recent comments

  • Ken Burns' National Parks Documentary: Where Does it Stand?   5 years 45 weeks ago

    I can't wait. I don't have film, but I've got loads of pictures, just loads. Have been an avid park explorer since my first road trip back in 2001. I just can't wait, and will get this on dvd when it's ready, just so I can say, hey, I've been there.....hurry up and finish,

  • Early Tourism in Yellowstone National Park Caught on Camera   5 years 45 weeks ago

    I loved this park the first time I was in it, back in the '70's. Then again 30 years later, not much had changed, it's still amazing. Of course we didn't have the bear come right up to our car. What a lovely video, wouldn't it be way cool to see if other parks have these pieces of history in their archives and would share. I've been to few that have and do. It's truly amazing what you can see and where you can go. thnx for sharing

  • Flamingo Lodge is No More   5 years 45 weeks ago

    Oh my.....I spent a couple of days, more like a week, touring the Everglades. It was May 2006. I loved it. Even the mosquito's. Of which there really weren't that many at that time of the year. Unfortunately, I wasn't able to get down to Flamingo, only because it was still closed down due to the hurricane of '05. I would have loved to have seen it before the cane took it out. But then, I'm in love with that type of architecture anyway. Back in the day, built by the CCC, but then that's just me. So, there is NO WAY, it will be rebuilt, not at all? Only die hard campers, I suppose, would go on down there and camp/rv it. But then again, that's just what us "die hards" do, isn't it?

  • NRA Appeals Ruling Blocking Concealed Carry in National Parks   5 years 45 weeks ago

    Storminator -- it's not just brown bears. Most handguns will put down a black bear....but we're also talking wolves, mountain lions (kill people every year here in Colorado), rattlesnakes (which we're allowed to shoot in state parks here), and coyotes.....and that's not counting the humans! Let's not forget the string of murders/rapes that occurred on the Appalachian Trail a few years ago at knife-point.

    The bottom line is this -- who cares? Continue to carry concealed in the park like everyone ALWAYS HAS. The only time you'll get in trouble is if you pull out your gun and use it. If you are smart, you'll be doing this for a life & death situation, and I'm quite sure the misdeamenor that follows won't really be of that much concern to you. If you have a CCW, you should have a good legal/lawyer insurance anyways, which will cover your rear.

  • Flamingo Lodge is No More   5 years 45 weeks ago

    The campgrounds are great and anyone who can't tollerate them can drive on over to Miami Beach. After all, there's nothing in the everglades but grass, water, and 'gaters.

  • Sections of Pacific Crest Trail Poached by Mountain Bikers; Could Problems Arise in National Parks?   5 years 45 weeks ago

    You know, I cannot hike for more than a few miles due to bad knees, but I can ride for many many more because there isn't the impact on my knees. Does this mean I should try and get some trails within the park service designated wheeled access for people like me? Am I being discriminated against because my knees are bad?

  • Designations Just One Example of Disparities Within the National Park System. Web Sites Are Another   5 years 45 weeks ago

    The parks' websites were unified in mid to late 2006, if I remember correctly. Before that date only the main pages were the same in the whole system and each park could set up as many subpages on any topic they liked and could build with their own staff. Some parks still have the archived version of their former website online - and for example about Glacier National Park you will find much better information in the archive than on the current pages.

    As far as I know, the new - or not so new anymore - websites were created in Harpers Ferry and the individual parks now can fill the given structure with their own content. But only in the given layout, site map structures and formats.

    And @ Kurt: Gauley River NRA probably is a nice place. But it is obviously attractive only for six weeks in a year, for white water paddling only. At all other times there seems to be absolutely nothing interesting about it. It is a gorge without road access, that could be nice for hiking, but there are no decent signed trails, not even a picnic site. In 1996 a general management plan was approved, but it seems like it was never implemented. So I leave it to the readers of the Traveller if Gauley River NRA is worth national status and if much needed funds should be spend on its website. Finally: the wikipedia access statistic works as all of them work, with a counter in the server software. It is supposed to be reliable.

  • NRA Appeals Ruling Blocking Concealed Carry in National Parks   5 years 45 weeks ago

    Dear storminator,

    CCW is a personal choice. If you don't want to exercise your 2nd amendment rights, that's up to you. To make comments like yours is just showing your ignorance and indifference. Maybe someday a CCW citizen will save your bacon and you will think otherwise...


  • Flamingo Lodge is No More   5 years 45 weeks ago

    What a dump, glad it's gone, 36 types of mosquitos in the area.

  • Sections of Pacific Crest Trail Poached by Mountain Bikers; Could Problems Arise in National Parks?   5 years 45 weeks ago

    The impact on trails is always brought up as a point to exclude mtbers despite many studies showing the opposite. Nobody is asking to build north shore stunts (for the uninitiated, google whistler bike park) or to create shuttle runs in Yellowstone.

    Volunteer trail work: I've seen plenty of ppl showing up where I am. I'm guessing that as a percentage, MTBers show up for trailwork as much as other categories of users (i.e. the vast majority never bothers...).

    Share the trail: I go plenty fast whenever possible and safe to do so, but I slow down when encountering hikers/equestrians like just about everybody else I know and ride with. Again, the trail sharing issue is overblown. Most users don't venture more than 1-2 miles into the park. Make separate trails near the trailhead and that would resolve 95% of the conflicts (not a study, just my guess).

    Random Walker: sharing existing trails in a responsible manner (which is all I'm asking for) does in no way conflict with preserving nature. It's always the same thing: the nature protection is just a rationalization to not share.

  • Sections of Pacific Crest Trail Poached by Mountain Bikers; Could Problems Arise in National Parks?   5 years 45 weeks ago

    Random Walker, well put...well put! I couldn't agree more with you.

  • Sections of Pacific Crest Trail Poached by Mountain Bikers; Could Problems Arise in National Parks?   5 years 45 weeks ago

    You are correct Zebulon (not verified) that I am bias and a card carrying member of the Sierra Club.
    I am a preservationist believing in the intrinsic value of wilderness itself and the National Parks mandate "to conserve the scenery and the natural and historic objects and wildlife therein, and to provide for the enjoyment of the same in such manner and by such means as will leave them unimpaired for the enjoyment of future generations."
    I abhor the continuous lobbying for more development in our National Parks and Wildernesses; be it buildings, roads or trails for mountain bikes, horses or boots, and the belief that nature should conform to the trends of society.

    "Every recreationist whether hiker, biker, horsepacker, or posey sniffer should not begin by asking, 'What's best for ME?' but rather 'What's best for the bears?'" ~Tom Butler~

  • Federal Judge Issues Scathing Opinion in Blocking "Concealed Carry" In National Parks, Wildlife Refuges   5 years 45 weeks ago

    Frank N. , Thank You for the research, and posting it. I am now curious to see how the "Law abiding citizens" react to your comment and facts. I have wondered for sometime how they are better than others just because they are allowed to carry a weapon that no one can see. I myself own guns, but I don't see the need to hide it while in the Nat. Parks, but thats just my personal feelings.

  • Designations Just One Example of Disparities Within the National Park System. Web Sites Are Another   5 years 45 weeks ago

    Chris makes a good point. The NPS websites all look the same. Unfortunately, letting each park build their own site would lead to huge inequalities in website design...most of which often end of looking very amateurish. Not the message you want sent by a world-class organization. I believe there should be a certain level of design that ties all the NPS sites together while allowing each park to strut it's own park's stuff, if they are so inclined.

    The size of the park isn't always a determinant as to how nice a particular park's website is. Remember, webmaster/web designer is often a collateral duty of someone who works at the office and it is up to the motivation of that individual as to how well the website is maintained and filled with content. I believe their should be a full-time person at the park or at the regional office who interacts with the interpretation and resource management staff. As I pointed out earlier, the web is THE most cost-effective way to reach people. One person, building a website, can reach thousands and tens of thousands of people. And, that reach isn't solely because the park is big or small. The search engines treat the NPS park sites as one collective giant website. So, any park that builds a website is automatically granted a very high ranking in regards to the keyword phrases that pertain to the particular park.

    Each park used to have it's own separate website...the NPS referred to these as "Expanded website" in... "See the Expanded website of Crater Lake National Park for more information." However, I think this is all slowly being rolled up into the Content Management System, the NPS has set up. By the way, the NPS website, while boring, is fairly well a usability sense.

    This all ties into the previous article on how many discrepancies there are in the parks. A website is no trivial thing. It's a symptom of how the NPS manages it's parks, in general.

    Executive Director,
    Crater Lake Institute
    Robert Mutch Photography,

  • Designations Just One Example of Disparities Within the National Park System. Web Sites Are Another   5 years 45 weeks ago

    They way I understand it is that most of the webdesign is done through a central office in DC. Individual parks can do very little, and most of the changes they can make are in the photo&multimedia section.

    Let's not forget that NPS website were completely redone in August 2006 (or 07). They've just undergone a massive, system-wide redesign and aren't likely to change anytime soon.

    And if you think that park pages aren't equal, try checking out other -

  • Federal Judge Issues Scathing Opinion in Blocking "Concealed Carry" In National Parks, Wildlife Refuges   5 years 45 weeks ago

    If you are that frightened that you think you need a gun in our national parks, just do us all a favor and stay home.

  • Alaska Game Officials Being Asked to Ease Off On Killing Bears and Wolves in National Park Preserves   5 years 45 weeks ago

    I was alerted to the plight of the wolves by an AARP group member. Researching the info I found more issues with the culling of our nation's Alaskan wildlife. What can I do? Who do I lobby? Why is this not mainstream news?

  • Designations Just One Example of Disparities Within the National Park System. Web Sites Are Another   5 years 45 weeks ago

    The really bad thing is that all the websites seem to look exactly the same and that even the Yellowstone website is not that good, at least not given the level of interest the park probably generates. The NPS should maybe consider revamping the entire website system.

    By the way, do webmasters have to use the NPS CMS? Or would the webmaster of, say, Gauley River be free to set up an entirely different website or is he bound to use the NPS-administered CMS?

  • Designations Just One Example of Disparities Within the National Park System. Web Sites Are Another   5 years 45 weeks ago

    Wait a second...because a park is small it should not bother with a large website? Now, that IS a weak argument. Especially when you consider how EASY it is for one person to make a huge difference with a website. Kurt is exactly right! We want to build interest in all the parks. Building a great website is the most cost-effective way possible to keep people informed and build interest. Look what Kurt has done with this website. It is so cheap to do. The National Park Service is supposed to manage ALL of the parks, not just the big ones!

    It looks to me like the NPS created a CMS (content management system) at the national level with standard templates and let the parks fill in their own content at the local level. The NPS should have a team of people build content (books, articles, images, etc) into ALL of these different park websites...instead, they leave it up to the local level. If the local park has the resources to add there own content, fine. I have no doubts that one team of people could build up every park website (to the level of Yellowstone's) in a year or two. Then, the only issue is maintaining current information, such as current conditions, news, and so forth.

    Believe me! I'v done it for our non-profit.

    Executive Director,
    Crater Lake Institute

  • Designations Just One Example of Disparities Within the National Park System. Web Sites Are Another   5 years 45 weeks ago

    I believe that there needs to be a baseline, or minimal amount of support delegated for all entities within the NPS. In this case, web support. Once this is established, we (the tax payers) should expect to receive the best "bang for the buck" when it comes to allocation and spending. I also understand this is easier said than done. Bottom line here is, not all public lands were created equal. Some require (and deserve), more care and attention than others. Let's make sure that ALL lands are researchable with adequate information. It is not necessary to exploit every resource.
    After all . . . Is it really such a bad thing to have a few lesser known gems to discover and explore?

  • Federal Judge Issues Scathing Opinion in Blocking "Concealed Carry" In National Parks, Wildlife Refuges   5 years 45 weeks ago

    We hear so much about the rights of "law abiding" citizens to bear arms. We hear about how CCW permit holders have "...demonstrated to the issuing state's satisfaction that they are responsible law abiding citizens and can be trusted to safely and responsibly carry concealed firearms because they are not a threat to themselves or others."
    Here are a few examples of that:

    In two reports that focused on the State of Florida, the
    Violence Policy Center found that as of July 1995, 469 Florida CCW licensees had been
    identified as having committed a wide variety of crimes. In just one year, between May 1995
    and May 1996, 159 Florida CCW licensees had their licenses revoked.

    Blacksburg, VA • February 1996. Robert Asbury died of a self-inflicted gun-shot wound after
    he shot and killed his estranged wife and one of his wife’s former co-workers at her home. On
    his CCW license application, Asbury wrote that he had owned and used guns for fifty years and
    regularly practiced at a gun range.

    Seattle, WA • December 9, 1998. Carlton Evans, a 37-year-old CCW licensee, was accused of
    killing his wife and baby daughter after months of abuse.

    Tualatin, OR • November 17, 1999. David Tanski, 53, rammed his car into another car that
    had taken a parking space he felt belonged to him. When the driver of the second car approached
    Tanski, Tanski pulled out a gun. Tanski, who has a CCW license, was charged with menacing.

    Fountain City, TN • December 1999. William Manies, 52, returned to his former office to seek
    revenge against the 45-year-old woman who fired him a month before. Manies, a CCW licensee,
    walked into the office and pointed a .38-caliber pistol at the victim and executed her while she
    sat in her chair, talking on the telephone.

    The Violence Policy Center has published four
    reports on CCW licensees in Texas. They found that Texas CCW licensees were arrested for
    5,314 crimes between January 1, 1996 and August 31, 2001, and since Texas’ CCW licensing
    law went into effect, licensees have been arrested for an average of two crimes per day.

    Florida • Lyglenson Lemorin
    retained his CCW license after two domestic violence arrests in 1997 and 1998. The first
    time he allegedly threw a beer bottle at his girlfriend’s neck. The second time he allegedly
    punched a pregnant former girlfriend, flashed his gun in her face and warned her, “I’ll kill you.”

    Columbia, SC • June 9, 2008. A 4-year-old girl shot herself in the chest after grabbing her
    grandmother’s handgun while riding in a shopping cart in a Sam’s Club store. The grandmother,
    Donna Hutto Williamson, is a CCW licensee and left her purse containing the handgun in the
    cart near the 4-year-old.

    Cincinnati, OH • October 2008. CCW licensee Robert Stahl, 71, was at his daughter’s Halloween party and
    was asked by one of several children there if he was dressed as a cowboy because he had a
    handgun on his hip. Stahl said he was not a cowboy and then took the gun out and unloaded the
    ammunition from the magazine, however, Stahl left a .45 caliber bullet in the gun’s chamber that
    went off and hit 10-year-old Jasmine Vincenzo in the stomach.

    Plaxico Burress had a CCW permit from Florida.

    To obtain a permit in Michigan handgun buyers simply must correctly answer 70% of the questions on a written safety test, but the wrong answers are pointed out and they are allowed to retake the test if they fail.

    There are many, many more such examples. The three things to remember are these: CCW licencees have tempers too; accidents happen; and, every single criminal who has ever lived was a "law abiding citizen" right up until the day that they weren't.

  • Sections of Pacific Crest Trail Poached by Mountain Bikers; Could Problems Arise in National Parks?   5 years 45 weeks ago


    First you condemn the "majority" of hikers, then you proclaim that once bikers are the "majority" they'll call the shots. So are you condemning the mountain bikers of the future? You're starting to sound like one of those "law-abiding" types who picks and chooses which laws they believe is worth following;-)

  • Sections of Pacific Crest Trail Poached by Mountain Bikers; Could Problems Arise in National Parks?   5 years 45 weeks ago

    man, this is totally flogging a dead horse with the same people commenting the same gripes and no one is giving an inch.

    zeb, your comments are as inwardly focused as those "greedy" hikers you talk about. i'd say mtn bikers are just, if not more, greedy than those hikers... as such...

    1) discriminated? how!?
    there is no federal legislation defining any sort of rights when it comes to recreation, so you mtn bikers aren't being "discriminated" against. look it up... that's why the alta ski area can deny snowboarders on federal property, albeit USFS. so discrimination? on what existing legal grounds?

    2) as one myself, mtn bikers only really care about the "flow" of the ride and aren't typically out to enjoy nature or show up to repair trail. i've said it again, i'll say it before, they don't show up to volunteer trail repair days... too busy riding, i guess? you don't ever really see them checking out the spring wildflowers or stopping to admire a rattlesnake...

    3) in terms of trail impact?
    mtn bikers reek havoc on trails... mind you, not as bad as horses, but they have far greater impact than hikers. especially in mud. AND, the new type of bikers, the downhillers go beyond creating new illegal trails, they even build structures with local materials! scant use or not, zebby, this goes much farther impact wise than hikers... additionally, having created illegal trails (not downhill) while mountain biking in the past, it's just so much easier and such a greater reward to do so on a bike, at least until the trails get ruined and you have to find another adventurous route to create.

    4) share the trail?
    that's a novel idea, if the bikers would ever slow down, like they are supposed to, and not push the hikers/trail runners/flower sniffers off the trail... not being the fastest of riders i've been damn near pushed off the trail myself from more aggressive (i do have a better word but this is a family site) riders. so share the trail? you mean completely yield it to mt. bikers when they want to pass, right? that or you mean ME FIRST, right? i have a bell on my rig and slow down and often let those on foot pass, but i have plenty of friends who won't and don't. they can, but please. now, you can judge this and come back and say "all of my friends" blah blah blah but honestly you'd be lying if you did. period. it sucks to slow down on your bike and i'd say most people won't for walkers/hikers/etc. admit it. that, or if you disagree, you aren't a solid mountain biker and are a tortoise on your bike, pushing on the uphills and walking the downhills because yer scared.

    it's time all trail users realized that they have an impact, but mountain bikers especially. i've been mountain biking for at least 20 years, depending on how pre suspension mountain bikes really qualify in that definition, so it's not like this doesn't come from some sort of rounded perspective. while they are relative newcomers (again, which i am one) they don't see their impact, but in terms of user experience and impact on the trails. maybe because they are moving too fast?

  • Yellowstone National Park Relocates the 45th Parallel   5 years 45 weeks ago

    My brother & I spent a week in Yellowstone camping last August 2008. We took our picture at the said sign, but have also seen the 45th sign on our way north on I75 headed to Petoskey where our sister lives. Our family lived and grew up in Clarkston MI, our parents have lived in the same house for 58 yrs. We used to have a cabin 7 miles east of Grayling on M=72.

  • March 1st was a Big Day for More Than One Park   5 years 45 weeks ago

    GREAT article on the Buffalo River! It's one of the areas BIGGEST and best kept secrets, although the word is getting out! :)