| Page 1468 | National Parks Traveler

Life sucks and is unfair. Get over it. Well, Frank, I guess that's kinda, sorta what I was saying too. :-) But, expressing it like that usually doesn't endear one to your opinion. Quite the opposite, actually. Like I was saying, we all play different parts in these discussions. -Kirby.....Lansing, MI

Sep 16th - 16:21pm | Kirby Adams

I have both a two year old son and a 73-year old father. I simply cannot ask them to make the same treks that I am capable of. Does that mean that they should be excluded from viewing our national treasures simply because of the limitations placed upon them due to their age? I think not.

Sep 16th - 15:12pm | Random Walker

And when I am old I shall take to the over abundance of roads and nature trails that Our National Parks provide me, all the while holding to heart Our National Parks doctrine of Protection and Preservation for Our Future Generations.

Sep 16th - 13:55pm | Ted Clayton

Kirky Adams, I'll bite. Let's have a quick look at Ed Abbey. Favorite quote:

Sep 16th - 13:54pm | dapster

Belling cats. It's what I do.... Much, likely a majority of the population is incapable of accessing our Natural Wonders, on foot.

Sep 16th - 13:10pm | Kirby Adams

No vehicles should be allowed in any national park. Park all them RVs and cars at the entrance and walk in! You wanna see Old Faithful? Hop on a mule. You're joking. On multiple levels. One certainly hopes.

Sep 16th - 13:09pm | Ted Clayton

dapster belled the cat: "Also, we haven’t even broached the subject of the access for the disabled." Seriously, this is it - the basic reality. Much, likely a majority of the population is incapable of accessing our Natural Wonders, on foot.

Sep 16th - 12:08pm | dapster

Anons I & II,

Sep 16th - 11:48am | jsmacdonald

The car has done one good thing for Yellowstone. Because people travel further and faster over a day, there are far fewer structures and buildings in Yellowstone than there used to be. The theory for awhile has been to horde large crowds of people into fewer areas so that the larger area of the park is protected at the sacrifice for the few.

Sep 16th - 11:27am | Ted Clayton

Anonymous proclaimed: "Park all them RVs and cars at the entrance ... Hop on a mule. You're joking. On multiple levels. One certainly hopes.

Sep 16th - 08:35am | dapster

Anon, My, how you like to make assumptions and read falsehoods into my words!

Sep 16th - 02:33am | MRC

While I applaud the decision as such, I see a huge problem coming up from it. This decision is not about the use of snowmobiles in the first place, it is about sloppy decision making in the NPS and even sloppier documentation of those decisions. Administrations decisions must be documented in such way that (judicial) oversight is possible.

Sep 16th - 00:36am | Ted Clayton

Jim, Ah - I knew that all snowmobiles are guided (which surely goes a long way to tamp down the yee-haw! factor), but not the 4-stroke requirement. I understand that models tuned for smooth riding, durability & economy (rental machines) are similar to automobiles in emissions.

Sep 16th - 00:35am | Anonymous

No vehicles should be allowed in any national park. Park all them RVs and cars at the entrance and walk in! You wanna see Old Faithful? Hop on a mule.

Sep 16th - 00:09am | jsmacdonald

Ted, The current plan calls for snowmobiles to be accompanied by a guide and that they be 4-stroke. So, if that isn't good enough, it's not clear what would satisfy the judge in this case.

Sep 16th - 00:06am | Random Walker

Yellowstone Superintendent Suzanne Lewis, National Park Service Director Mary Bomar and Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne each wholly deserve this finely worded 63-page bitch slap, IMHO. Reads to me like Judge Sullivan did his homework.

Sep 15th - 22:47pm | Ted Clayton

bearguy, Alaska! Do you have a sense how the general Alaska snowmobile community stands on this question? Is it typical or atypical for an Alaskan snowmobiler to oppose their use in Parks?

Sep 15th - 21:51pm | Anonymous

Why do we keep allowing these motorized machines to pollute the environment in all our parks. The parks are not meant for racing etc they are meant to preserve the plants and animals and allow for guarded enjoyment by the public in such a way that the environment or animals are not interfered with.

Sep 15th - 21:32pm | Ted Clayton

There might be some pertinent insight to be gained, by looking into the background & history of Judge Sullivan. There's always been hangin' Judges, and warnin' Judges. From the points Kurt quotes the Judge as listing, the bench is basically 'fixing' the Park's winter use Plan. "You need to do better here, you need to be more specific there."

Sep 15th - 21:13pm | Anonymous

I am not saying that anything should be banned. All I did was point out the difference in the reaction to similar cases in YELL and CAHA. And wonder why the CAHA crew hasn't jumped on the bandwagon to allow snowmobiles in YELL....

Sep 15th - 21:10pm | bearguy

As an Alaskan who has spent time on a snow machine I support this decision. Snowmachines, ORVs, and other such vehicles have no place in parks whose mission is to protect and preserve the scenery and the ecosystems. These recreational activities are not compatible with this directive. There are other public and private lands where these damaging activities can occur.

Sep 15th - 20:57pm | dapster

It's ironic that most of these comments are in favor of keeping snowmobiles out of YELL, yet most of the commentators on CAHA issues want motorized access. Perhaps many of the CAHA people aren't interested in YELL? Or is YELL somehow different than CAHA? If so, is it really our - or anyone's - prerogative to say that one park is more deserving of protection than another?

Sep 15th - 20:55pm | JaeC

I agree with Paul. There has to be other places for people to snowmobile in the winter besides Yellowstone NP. Or any other National Park for that matter. Animals and habitat are already under stress in the winter. Why add more? My hats off to all the people involved in reaching this decision.

Sep 15th - 18:42pm | Anonymous

Sep 15th - 18:19pm | Anonymous

Let's see if this one holds...we've been here before. Its time to give the park back to the native species as much as possible during the stressful times of winter (especially last year), and to allow those who visit the park in winter for the very reason of skiing within a pristine landscape with no mechanical noise--or as little as possible.

Sep 15th - 17:47pm | Barky

Huzzah! And what a way to bring a flame-bait topic to NPT! ;-)

Sep 15th - 17:12pm | Everyone deserv...

Another case of one person (judge) deciding how a public asset can and cannot be untilized by the public.

Sep 15th - 16:17pm | Anonymous

Art Sedlack was ahead of his time! At any rate - here is a relevant historical article on the history of snowmobiles in Glacier Park and Yellowstone. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3951/is_200310/ai_n9338664/pg_1

Sep 15th - 16:03pm | craigmn3

I have to say, this seems like a good thing to me. Hundreds of loud, polluting machines will be kept out of yellowstone. You don't need to tear up the landscape if you can ride in snowcoaches.

Sep 15th - 16:03pm | SteveB

Way to go, Judge Sullivan! And congratulations to the dedicated people at GYC, Wilderness Society, NPCA, SC, WWA and NRDC who have kept at this fight all these years! (Cheers to JC and KB!) I only hope that when Palin revs up her rhetoric against this decision that our conservation-minded pols don't shy away from speaking out in defense of park protective policies.

Sep 15th - 15:51pm | Random Walker

"(T)his is not blanket permission to have fun in the parks in any way the NPS sees fit." Right on Judge Sullivan! Reminds me of one of my favorite Aldo Leopold quotes, "Recreational development is a job not of building roads into the lovely country, but of building receptivity into the still unlovely human mind. "

Sep 15th - 15:19pm | Anonymous

There is no mystery about what is going on here. Just have to look to see what elected officials live near Yellowstone and Grand Teton.

Attendance Shortfalls at Steamtown National Historic Site Prompt Calls for Privatization

Sep 16th - 14:11pm | Anonymous

CLARIFYING RESPONSES to RoadRanger; to Beamis; to ChrisBugsyShallFall:

Sep 16th - 12:00pm | Bugsyshallfall

Beamis is right when he says

Sep 15th - 17:34pm | Barky

Don't forget that decades ago Steamtown was a private interest in Vermont (I remember hearing the ads on TV when I was a kid). The original owner (er, perhaps I mean primary financial supporter) died in the 60's and the Vermont park went out of business. So would Steamtown survive today as a private concern again?

Sep 15th - 15:54pm | RoadRanger

STEA is another example of "build it and they will come" mentality compounded by Rust Belt welfare handed out where commercial capital will not go. In the bit of research I've done on this issue over the last day or two, it seems that STEA was half of the anchor designed to revitalize downtown Scranton.

Sep 15th - 13:42pm | Bugsyshallfall

Ok, The story on Steamtown is this, the much of the place of the park is historic and worth protecting but "sort off" on a local and regional scope. However, it was the rail yard and headquatersfor one of the first lines in the USA and is one of the best examples of "age of steam".

Sep 15th - 12:26pm | Lone Hiker

My error Beamis. The annual Little League tournament games at Cooperstown are indeed not the "official" LLWS finals. More of a preliiminary finals would be accurate. Ah, good 'ol Monday mornings, when the fingers and what little brain I have remaining aren't coordinating too well.

What's the Solution For Cape Hatteras National Seashore?

Sep 16th - 11:25am | dapster

Jesse, Welcome to the debate! I thought this one had run it's course.

Sep 16th - 01:51am | Jesse Justice

We are for protecting the wildlife and Habitat, because we are apart of it and want to continue to be a part of it. That is why the ORV groups do beach sweeps,not environmental groups. It is ORV groups offering the reward for vandelized bird closures,not the enviromental groups, they're too busy looking for the next law suit .

A Historian's Take on the National Park Service

Sep 16th - 10:22am | Rob Mutch

Kurt, Thanks for posting this. It was an interesting read. I need to go through P.J.'s back issues of Thunderbear. Rob

House Subcommittee Considers Bill to Relax ORV Rules for Cape Hatteras National Seashore

Sep 15th - 21:30pm | Jeremy

Geezer, I think everyone has had enough "good models" falsehoods, lies and fake science from you people from the darkside. Quote "The consent decree was a valuable first step toward reasonable long-term limitations on ORVs." We have more than eleven thousand people on a petition that would beg to differ with such lies.

Getting American Youth More Involved in the National Parks is a Difficult Challenge and a Golden Opportunity

Sep 15th - 17:51pm | Barky

Nice article, Chance. Especially like this part: The Park Service should consider adapting the WebRangers program to work as an application for Facebook or Myspace, the two most popular social networking sites. Youth would then be able to proclaim their NPS pride right on their profile, and learn something in the process.

Sep 15th - 15:30pm | Mom

Thank you Chance. And I credit my Mom for sharing the Smokies with me. May you find the peace and joy in the mountains as I do.

Sep 15th - 13:44pm | Bugsyshallfall

You know, maybe we should think about relaxing the advertisings restrictions on NPS.

Sep 15th - 12:56pm | Kelly at VNPA

Chance, thanks for a lovely, thought-providing essay. Another important player is the philanthropic community (private and corporate foundations), as well as the donations that individuals give to their national parks and the friends groups that support the national parks. Much more funding is needed than is currently available.

Prime Location and Varied Habitat Help Make Point Reyes National Seashore a Biodiversity Treasure Trove

Sep 15th - 14:27pm | Bob Janiskee

Yes, I agree that Indiana Dunes has received less attention than it deserves in Traveler. I'll try to remedy that at some early opportunity.

Sep 15th - 14:25pm | Anonymous

You want diversity in a small area? Try Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore. Only 15,000 acres with more than 1400 species of plants, including more than 30 species of native orchids, and 46 species of mammals. I wager no other NPS area has so much in so little space.

Support Journalism about National Parks!

National Parks Traveler is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit.

Donate Now!

The Essential RVing Guide

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.

National Parks Traveler

Search