Recent comments

  • Construction Starts In March To Expand Delicate Arch Parking Lot At Arches National Park   1 week 5 days ago

    One important factor in this equation is distance. It's a lot farther than in Zion. Something like 40 miles roundtrip instead of 14. Covering that distance while carrying all the passengers needing transport would require a whole lot more vehicles than are required in Zion where each shuttle can make a round trip in about an hour. I'm guessing here, but figure it would require perhaps four times as much time to make the trip in Arches. Thus, it would be reasonable that it would require four times as many vehicles, drivers, mechanics and other support. And, four times the $$$s.

    Also, the park entrance is in a canyon bounded on one side by highway and the other side by cliffs. There is no place within the park's entrance area for adequate parking. A big parking lot will be needed somewhere outside the park and probably several miles away in either direction. (Maybe the area along the Colorado River where a few million dollars were recently spent to remove a few million tons of uranium mine waste would make a good spot. It's big enough. And if you park there long enough, your car might glow in the dark. That would be novel.)

    Allowing people to drive private vehicles into the park would defeat the purpose. But for those who want to go to the campground -- which is at the far end of the 20 mile road -- could be handled in the same manner as vehicles belonging to guests at Zion Lodge. A red tag on the dashboard allows entrance to the lodge parking lot and no more. Once at the lodge, the car is parked and they ride the shuttle.

    Don't get me wrong. I'm 110% in favor of developing a shuttle at Arches. It can be done and should be done. But it ain't a-gonna be easy.

    As for the sensitivity of the area at the Delicate Arch trailhead -- heck yes, it's sensitive. Unless it has been moved since I was there last time, it's in one of very few riparian areas along a small creek fed by a feeble spring. It's also right beside the historic Wolf Ranch homestead shown in the photo accompanying the article. Besides, as someone pointed out above, EVERY part of a natural national park is sensitive.

    Then there are all the political angles involved. I believe I am correct in saying that the Zion shuttles enjoyed full support from Senator Bob Bennett. Bennett was a moderate who was dumped in a party convention when the Tea Party went after him. He was replaced by Mike Lee who is about as far out as one can get. Expecting any support from Lee is like wishing for the Good Fairy to pay a visit.

    While it's very easy to blame park administration and WASO and DOI, it's almost certainly not that simple.

  • Joy Riders At Cape Hatteras National Park Tear Up Cape Point Campground Grounds   1 week 5 days ago

    Looks more like 4x4 truck tracks to me, what a mess.

  • Call For Papers: National Parks, The Next Century   1 week 5 days ago

    I'm really curious.

    When Director Jarvis was first nominated, all I heard from rank and file NPS employees was a great satisfaction that someone up from the ranks of the NPS was being chosen to lead, rather than a career politician from elsewhere. What I'm curious about is if all those voices have changed their minds or if they are now just drown out by the Red Queen "off with her head" crowd.

  • Construction Starts In March To Expand Delicate Arch Parking Lot At Arches National Park   1 week 5 days ago

    No, we have to ask whether the park is "senstive."

    And why is that not a reasonable question? Sounds to me that you have your "solution" and are looking for a problem when it might not exist.

  • Call For Papers: National Parks, The Next Century   1 week 5 days ago

    SmokiesBackpacker said it all. It is time for Jarvis to go and new leadership to take over the National Park Service and remember what the parks are for and why they were founded.

    On another note, why is it that we do not have an accurate and complete history of the role of concessions in the history of the National Park Service. This important topic has never been covered. Perhaps we can take some of the money now being raised and spent on 2016 and write this history. I think this would be a wonderful present to give to National Park Service Management, Congress and the American people.

  • Joy Riders At Cape Hatteras National Park Tear Up Cape Point Campground Grounds   1 week 5 days ago

    Minimizing the damage at first sounded to me like someone was preparing to confess and starting to mount his defense argument.

  • Joy Riders At Cape Hatteras National Park Tear Up Cape Point Campground Grounds   1 week 5 days ago

    I don't care for the local ORV orgs politics concerning CHNS but I can assure readers they find that kind of activity just as disgusting as me. Most likely this is youngsters and involves alcohol.

  • Construction Starts In March To Expand Delicate Arch Parking Lot At Arches National Park   1 week 5 days ago

    Noting the comments above, you can understand what Winston Churchill meant. Round and round we go when the solution is right there in front of us. Then do it now. No, we have to ask whether the park is "senstive." Then we have to protest the cost. Then we have to protest the distances involved. Then we have to protest the time it would take. And so, once again we reach for the six gun. Boom! Lay the asphalt and be done with it.

    Meanwhile, back at the ranch, the boys in the bunkhouse are talking about all of the wind farms we will need to halt climate change. They seem to have no trouble funding those. Who were those masked men that stole all of the Park Service's funding? The Koch brothers? No, the president of the United States.

    He does the budget. Why is the Park Service at the bottom of the heap, while General Electric gets all it wants?

    Don't tell me this is a funding issue. It's never a funding issue. It is rather about who has the power and dares exercise it for good or ill. As Jeffrey Immelt of GE put it to a colleague of mine just last year, "I am at the table in the White House, and you aren't."

    Well, let's get to the table. It's time. Ask Hillary Clinton what she has mind for the national parks Ask Jeb Bush. The Koch brothers will be hoping to buy both of them. GE will spend lavishly on their campaigns. How about we remind every candidate next year what a democracy is? If we have the time to waff waff with one another here, will we take the time to exercise that privilege?

    Kurt, we need major articles on the parks philosophy of every candidate. Then we need them to go viral, as did the trademarks issue, thanks to you. No more Mr. Nice Guy. Just a few votes can swing a state. How about we make those swing votes count for parks?

  • Keep Track Of Events Surrounding Acadia National Park's Centennial Celebration At This Website   1 week 5 days ago

    The Acadia Centennial Web site not only lets you link to the evolving calendar of events, it also invites individuals, businesses and non-profits to become part of history, by applying to be an Acadia Centennial Partner.

    Historians, artists, garden societies and museums are among those already announcing their intentions during this once in a century opportunity. Read about how you, too, can become a Centennial Partner, in our blog post:

    www.acadiaonmymind.com/2015/02/partners-celebrate-acadia-national-park-c...

  • Joy Riders At Cape Hatteras National Park Tear Up Cape Point Campground Grounds   1 week 5 days ago

    I am disappointed by the amount of support these vandals are getting in some of these comments.

    Where do you see anyone giving them support?

  • Construction Starts In March To Expand Delicate Arch Parking Lot At Arches National Park   1 week 5 days ago

    I wasn't thinking new money, but rather money already budgeted for transportation programs, such as the Paul S. Sarbanes Transit in Parks Program.

  • Construction Starts In March To Expand Delicate Arch Parking Lot At Arches National Park   1 week 5 days ago

    A shuttle would seem to make sense to me also oawever I imagine those costs are quite high. Vehicle purchase, drivers, insurance, maintenance, storage etc... Getting the federal govt to pitch in while attractive to those who love the parks is still money from our pockets as well as those who don't use the parks at all. We need to stop thinking of govt money as somehow being free. I'm not suggesting that that is what you are saying Kurt, but there does seem to be a tendency for people to think in those terms.

  • Construction Starts In March To Expand Delicate Arch Parking Lot At Arches National Park   1 week 5 days ago

    Once again, EC, you state you haven't been there, so your knowledge of the area is a big ZERO.

    Which is why I ask the question. Unlike you Gary, I don't pretend to know things that I don't actually know. I do see however that Zion is a single relatively short road for the tram. Arches on the otherhand is much longer and has several spurs which would make the tram/bus service much less efficient.

    Now I will ask a third time. Is the parking area at the trailhead of the Delicate Arch trail a particularly sensitve area? If not, I don't see the objection.

  • Joy Riders At Cape Hatteras National Park Tear Up Cape Point Campground Grounds   1 week 5 days ago

    I am disappointed by the amount of support these vandals are getting in some of these comments.

  • Construction Starts In March To Expand Delicate Arch Parking Lot At Arches National Park   1 week 5 days ago

    Well, Moab isn't quite as close to Arches as Springdale is to Zion. While you can walk into Zion from Springdale in a few minutes, Moab is five miles south of the entrance to Arches.

    Still, if Park City can leverage the federal government for transportation funds to operate its free bus system, which not only circles downtown Park City but reaches 8 miles north of town to some subdivisions and shopping areas, it would seem possible that Moab could qualify for the same program to get visitors to the park's visitor's center, where a park shuttle system could originate.

    Making a loop to the Windows area, then Delicate Arch, and finally the Devils Garden lot, would seem feasible. But park staff has evaluated this possibiity and decided it's not.

  • Call For Papers: National Parks, The Next Century   1 week 5 days ago

    What a great idea for the 100th anniversary!

    Good luck.

    Danny Bernstein

    www.hikertohiker.com

  • Time To Register For Annual Wildflower Pilgrimage At Great Smoky Mountains National Park   1 week 5 days ago

    Come to the Wildlife Pilgrimage.

    It's an amazing array of hikes and flower walks. People come from all over the country and even the world.

    This is not a "local" event.

    Danny

    www.hikertohiker.com

  • Construction Starts In March To Expand Delicate Arch Parking Lot At Arches National Park   1 week 5 days ago

    Once again, EC, you state you haven't been there, so your knowledge of the area is a big ZERO. Moab is a very small and compact town, and sits right next to the park boundary. It's very similar to Springdale, and it's close proximity to Zion. In fact, the two parks have a lot of similarities. The system they have setup in that park is very smart. I don't see why a park entrance pass couldn't be included in the shuttle fees. You hop on the shuttle, everyone pays a few bucks for the service, which pays for a "day pass" and basically the shuttle is funded through that service. They could then put limits on the amount of cars per day allowed into the park. Once the limit is exceeded, they are then asked to go to Moab (where there is a lot of parking), and they can take the shuttle into the park. Don't see how this is "uneconomical". Especially in a park that gets millions of visitors a year. This isn't rocket science, except to maybe realtors.

  • Call For Papers: National Parks, The Next Century   1 week 5 days ago

    Two of the main points in this article are how the parks never were intended to be economic engines and the second is how can the parks attract and retain minorities and young people. Well, one way would be to stop allowing the local chambers of commerce dictate park policy. Second, quit allowing concessionaires to "own" the park and generating a fostering of dependence upon their money. And third, quit pricing children and minorities out of the park through onerous fees. The organic act was intended to leave the parks "unimpaired for future generations". These burdensome fees and overpriced concession arrangements are doing that very thing. As a result, the NPS has reduced visitation to areas with these ridiculous, double taxation fees.

    It is time for Jarvis to be gone. We need an NPS Diogenes to find the honest manager beholden to actual park users and not the chambers of commerce and money changers. (Of course if the top dog at NPS has a brother that lobbies the NPS on behalf of concessionaires, you know that culture is embedded to the core)

  • Construction Starts In March To Expand Delicate Arch Parking Lot At Arches National Park   1 week 5 days ago

    A shuttle system that ran a continuous loop from Moab to several key stops in the park would make the most sense. Could it be funded? Don't know.

    Is the area around Delicate Arch is "particularly sensitive"? I suppose you mean from an ecological standpoint; from a visual standpoint, pavement rates a zero (or below) on most people's scale. Some recognize that land in parks is a finite resource, and therefore all of it could be considered "sensitive." That's clearly a question of perspective and values, and opinions will vary.

  • Joy Riders At Cape Hatteras National Park Tear Up Cape Point Campground Grounds   1 week 5 days ago

    Thank you beachdumb. Good response.

  • Joy Riders At Cape Hatteras National Park Tear Up Cape Point Campground Grounds   1 week 6 days ago

    What a bunch of d-a's - hope they get caught and have to pay a HUGE fine and the costs of repairs!!

  • Construction Starts In March To Expand Delicate Arch Parking Lot At Arches National Park   1 week 6 days ago

    There could easily be a shuttle system that combines moab, and the park.

    A shuttle system from Moab to the park and then what? Another shuttle system to get to your destination. You could spend half the day just "shuttling" to and fro. That doesn't sound very practical nor economic to me.

    I ask again, is the area around the Delicate Arch particularly sensitive?

  • Construction Starts In March To Expand Delicate Arch Parking Lot At Arches National Park   1 week 6 days ago

    EC, the only paved enterance into Arches is right next to Moab. There could easily be a shuttle system that combines moab, and the park. It seems like a no-brainer at this point, especially since the layout of the park is stringingly similar to Zion (only one real paved loop road through the main corridor of the park). The fact that this sort of thing hasn't been considered or implemented, or a cap on the amount of people that can hike to delicate arch in a single day leaves me cold. Instead, they just pave a bigger parking lot. Seems like a better answer would have been to start a shuttle system. It can and should be done. Arches is a very popular park.

  • Construction Starts In March To Expand Delicate Arch Parking Lot At Arches National Park   1 week 6 days ago

    I haven't been to Arches so I am not all that familiar with the layout. But..... it seems to me even with a shuttle, the cars have to park somewhere. Is the current lot at the trailhead of the Delicate Arch trail a more sensitive area than the Visitor center - where I presume your shuttle would originate?