An internal investigation into a ranger who "tased" a Native American visitor at Petroglyph National Monument determined that he acted appropriately. The individual who was tased was cited for going off trail, providing false information, and failing to obey the ranger.
“The National Park Service remains committed to respecting the rights and dignity of every individual. This incident provided a learning experience for us to build on how we incorporate Tribal and Pueblo perspectives in our everyday work,” said National Park Service Regional Director Mike Reynolds in a statement issued Friday. “In the months ahead, we will be working with the Pueblo and Tribal communities to develop ways to better coordinate use of the area for ceremonial and religious purposes.”
The incident occurred December 27 when the unidentified ranger approached the man and his female companion to ask them to return to the marked trail they had left because they were "off trail on rocks containing petroglyphs," according to the Park Service.
"This is not a big deal, this is a simple warning," said the ranger, whose body camera captured the interaction.
While the ranger explained that it was his job to protect the monument because it is considered sacred to tribes, and noted that there had been past issues with graffiti, the man responded that, "We don't do that."
The ranger told the couple that he just needed their names so he could check to see if they previously had been warned about going off trail in the monument, but the man said he wasn't going to provide that information. His companion did provide their names, which the National Park Service later said were fictitious.
"You don't need my identification, sir," the man told the ranger. "Native Americans and the goverment and the law don't mesh well, you know that."
The man, who later identified himself to news reporters as Darrell House, walked away while the ranger contacted the monument's dispatch center to run a check on the names he was given. When the ranger caught up to the couple, who were now back on a trail, the man again refused to answer the ranger's questions.
"So, let me get this straight, you'd like to escalate this contact by refusing to identify yourself, and then in which case you're going to be detained until I can ID you?" the ranger asked.
As the man walked away, the ranger followed him, asking that he stop or he risked being "tased." The ranger then asked the man to give his small dog to his companion.
"My dog ain't going anywhere," replied the man, who had picked up the small dog.
"Sir, please give her the dog," the ranger said.
"My dog ain't going anywhere," the man again replied.
"OK, here's what I need you to do. Stop right now sir. Stop walking. Stop walking or you may be tased. Stop walking," the ranger said.
While the man stood holding his dog, the ranger could be seen aiming his Taser at the man. The man refused to give his companion the dog and started yelling "help," at which point the ranger shot him with the stun gun.
The Park Service investigation "determined that the law enforcement ranger's actions were consistent with agency policy and appropriate given the totality of the circumstances, including policy to preserve the significant cultural resources of the petroglyphs," the statement issued Friday said. Additionally, it noted that the Park Service "has worked to renew its commitment to Tribal engagement and is drawing on community partnerships to strengthen collaboration and cultural awareness within and outside of the monument."
With input from local Pueblos and Tribes, the Park Service is working to implement a plan to strengthen protection of the sensitive cultural resources found in the park through a designated trail system.
Park staff also recently met with representatives from the Ancestral Lands Conservation Corps, a long-term partner of the park, to identify ways to improve incorporation of Pueblo and Tribal work crews, youth and families into park programming and projects.
The National Park Service has also sought cultural awareness training for its employees and expert guidance from the Indian Pueblo Cultural Center and will continue to pursue future opportunities with the City of Albuquerque’s Open Space Division and Office of Diversity and Inclusion.
Comments
so ecbuck, did this man DESERVE to be tased? was this man breaking a rule? yes. at the end of the day was he hurting or harming anything? no. who in the government has the right to tell me where i can and cant go on public property? Uncle sam needs to take a step back.... how can it be illegal to be a natural human in a country that calls itself "the freest country in the world"? the US is a joke, its no different than china or russia at all... it makes me sick
Yes, the man deserved to be tased. Yes, this man was breaking a rule. Yes, he was hurting or harming the land. The Constitution gives the government the right to tell you what to do on Federal Government owned property. There are many places where Uncle Sam needs to step back where it doesn't have Constitutional authority to tread. This isn't one of them. I suggest that if you really believe the US is no better than China or Russia that you should move to China or Russia and discover how ignorant a statement that is. Though, we are moving in that direction in many respects.
Sure. I originally thought that maybe this wasn't appropriate (like one ranger who Tased a dog walker at GGNRA), but there were additional reports of his oddball behavior. That ranger at GGNRA lost a lawsuit and I heard was reassigned, but this guy was being ridiculous.
Of course I wish that federal law enforcement could have used a few more Tasers at a certain event on January 6 on federal government properly. I personally thought that they were too easy on people who were actively assaulting the police. Tasers would have been appropriate, although they did deploy batons, chemical irritants, and one instance of firearm.
y_p_W - Yes tasers would have been appropriate on Jan 6 if the police actually wanted to stop the protesters.
"Of course I wish that federal law enforcement could have used a few more Tasers at a certain event on January 6"
And also at the hundreds of riots that took place prior to the ONE on Jan 6th where businesses were destroyed and looted, private citizens attacked and murdered, government buildings burned and police attacked and murdered.
Do you have an example of where there wasn't an appropriate police response given the situation? I saw video of plenty of these where police deployed riots equipment including chemical irritants, batons, etc. What I saw happening at the Capitol Building on January 6 was literally police being under extreme duress where one officer lost an eye and there where several who suffered major injuries as a result of being beaten with poles and other objects such as helmets. And one being crushed by a door. There was nothing like it the previous year. The only thing I saw that even came close to that kind of incursion into a government building was when that member of the Oregon House let people into their (closed to the public) capitol building, and where police were attacked trying to eject them and even where the police were attacked with pepper spray.
I don't agree with people who use violence to achieve their political goals, whether it's people throwing objects at police or the Proud Boys randomly firing paintball guns at people on the street. They should all be charged appropriately and dealt with appropriately. But sure - I guess if you agree with their goals, it's easy enough to discount the January 6 incursion as just another riot. I think the police in DC showed a lot more restraint than I believed than was appropriate given the level of violence.
That doesn't necessarily mean that I agree with all use of force by police. The National Park Service still needs to answer for what happened in and around Lafayette Park on the day they cleared it. I still haven't heard of any final resolution as to why US Park Police officers attacked a reporter and her camera operator who were clearly press.
That answer has already been provided.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/police-did-not-clear-protesters-...
Yeah nothing. Just 2000 police officers injured in a few weeks.
"More than 2,000 law enforcement officers were injured in the first weeks of protests over the summer following the police killing of George Floyd, according to a report released in October."
https://www.wdrb.com/news/national/police-chief-association-releases-num...