You are here

Reader Participation Day: Which Presidential Nominee Would Be Better For The National Park System?

Share

Thankfully, there are just two weeks left to go in the 2016 general election. Which begs the question: Which nominee would be better for the National Park System and National Park Service?

While Democrat Hillary Clinton did put forth a statement outlining her intention to create a trust fund for the parks, not much has been heard from Republican Donald Trump on the parks specifically.

There have been reports that Mr. Trump would support the transfer of some federal lands in the West to states, a position the Republican Party adopted at its convention this past summer. And how would his proposal to build a wall along the U.S. - Mexico border impact border parks such as Big Bend National Park, Chamizal National Memorial, Coronado National Memorial, and Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument?

Which candidate do you think would be best for the park system and Park Service?

Comments

Maybe what we really need is the option to vote for NONE OF THE ABOVE in all elections.  If None wins, incumbents remain in office and another election is scheduled within 90 days or so.  This is repeated until a decent candidate comes forward.


Gary, words like " teabagging consortium", to me, throws your entire statement into the toilet. We get that you don't care for them, (or whomever you don't care for) but name calling makes you look like... nevermind.


TA - start with Snopes and get back to me with any source material that doesn't involve a path from or through Breitbart.

 

Eric - you haven't gotten back to me about that long moonlit walk, so don't talk to me about running away.


Ohh well...life goes on. I don't like teabaggers.  Never will, and never shall.  They are the scourge of the american political system and need flushed out of the system.


you haven't gotten back to me about that long moonlit walk,

Didn't see a request or need to respond.  Didn't run from anything.  Unlike your challange to Trail who was accurate in every respect.


Be specific, Rick, please.  What do you dispute?  Hillary as Secratary of State signing off to the sale of 20% of US Uranium reserves to Russian interests via a Canadian Company that donated millions to the Clinton Foundation?  Lots and lots of that sort of thing revolving around the central theme of corruption, serious corruption.  To think of her as a possible "Environmental"  President really stretches the mind but there is no end to the deceptive messaging out there after focus groups and data collecting to find a way to make a pile of merde smell like fillet.  Specifics, Rick, please.



Snopes has found your argument as unfounded, and sourced from a Breitbart propaganda article.


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.