You are here

NPCA: Desert Sunlight Solar Farm Evidence Of Why California Desert Protection And Recreation Act Is Needed

Share

The timing no doubt was coincidence, but while Interior Secretary Sally Jewell was celebrating the country's largest solar project in California, two U.S. senators were introducing legislation to protect desert landscapes in the state.

The irony wasn't lost on the National Parks Conservation Association, which has questioned the location of the solar farm.

“There is a lot of celebrating today in the California desert. Senator Feinstein released the California Desert Conservation and Recreation Act and Sally Jewell flipped the on-switch at Desert Sunlight Solar plant. The confluence of these events highlights the important work that remains to be done in the California desert," said David Lamfrom, NPCA's California Desert associate director. "That includes permanently protecting some of the most beautiful and vibrant lands in America and the continued need to do a better job of siting renewable energy away from species-rich lands. Considering how important our national parks and protected lands are to our desert economy, finding this balance now is fundamental​.”

Earlier Monday, the Interior secretary and the director of the Bureau of Land Management Neil Kornze joined California state and industry leaders to “flip the switch” on the Desert Sunlight Solar Farm. Now operating at full capacity, the Desert Sunlight Solar Farm is providing 550 megawatts of electricity to the grid, enough energy to power 160,000 average homes. The facility is estimated to displace 300,000 tons of carbon dioxide per year – the equivalent to taking 60,000 cars off the road.

“Solar projects like Desert Sunlight are helping to create American jobs, develop domestic renewable energy and cut carbon pollution,” said Secretary Jewell. “I applaud the project proponents for their vision and entrepreneurial spirit to build this solar project and commend Governor Brown for implementing policies that take action on climate change and help move our nation toward a renewable energy future.”

Desert Sunlight is the sixth solar project approved on public lands that is now operational. Together with wind, solar and geothermal, the renewable energy projects built on public lands since 2009 are producing over 2,200 megawatts of power, or enough to power almost 700,000 average homes. An additional 2,500 megawatts is currently under construction, including eight solar projects in California and Nevada.

Desert Sunlight is located on about 4,100 acres managed by the BLM in Riverside County, about 70 miles east of Palm Springs and six miles north of the rural community of Desert Center. The facility uses more than eight million First Solar photovoltaic modules to generate power with no air emissions, no waste production and no water use. The thin film technology has the smallest carbon footprint of any photovoltaic technology. The renewable energy is sold to Pacific Gas & Electric Company and Southern California Edison under long-term contracts.

As part of the Interior Department’s commitment to responsible development of renewable energy, the Desert Sunlight project underwent extensive environmental review and mitigation. The BLM worked in close coordination with Desert Sunlight, the National Park Service and other stakeholders to significantly reduce the proposed project’s total footprint down from the proposed 19,000 acres. The BLM is requiring that Desert Sunlight provide funding for acquisition and enhancement of more than 7,500 acres of suitable habitat for desert tortoise and other sensitive wildlife species to help mitigate the project’s potential impacts.

Also on Monday, Sens. Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer, both California Democrats, introduced legislation that would expand by 75,000 acres the Mojave National Preserve and Death Valley and Joshua Tree national parks.

“This piece of legislation is the final chapter in a long effort to preserve one of the most magnificent landscapes in the United States,” Sen. Feinstein said. “We must ensure that critical parts of the California desert—with its mountain vistas, bighorn sheep, mule deer, desert tortoises, Joshua trees, Native American petroglyphs and much more—will be protected for all time.”

Comments

Why bother? You'll dodge.

Dodge, or provide answers you don't like and can't refute.  Just more of your empty accusations.

And I read the csmonitor article.  Don't quite see what your point was. I certainly didn't see where the article claimed all the top of the economic heap had an entitlement mentality.  Can prayer help. Probably, but more those that are praying than those being prayed for. 


Suddenly, I'm not feeling the "love." EC, I have great respect for the corporate class; however, it is not the latest bunch. When my dad worked at "the plant," the owner made ten times his salary. Now it is often hundreds more. You say there is nothing unethical about sending a job overseas. Agreed. However, then you say that perhaps by exporting a job, the company can offer a superior product at a lower price. Today's corporate class argues this all the time. The adjective in play is "superior." But what if it is NOT superior? What if it is only cheaper to make? That blazer I bought from Nordstrom's made in the USA? It lasted me five years. I can't find it anymore at that allegedly "lower price." What I can find at the price is at Men's Wearhouse and hardly lasts a year.

As a historian, I am always looking for the adjectives. Do they describe the action or do they mislead? Green in front of energy is also an adjective meant totally to mislead. How about just energy? Well, the corporate moguls know that will never work. As do you know by your choice of words that "superior" is needed to make your argument. The point remains that if the consumer cannot afford it, because the consumer no longer has a job, it doesn't matter the quality or the price. We're done. Asia rising. Until yes, WE go in the hole.

Right now, we are spending down our inheritance to keep all of this afloat. Fine. I just don't want it to include our public lands. The billionaires can have the rest of it, but I still don't think we should give them that. And one day, probably when we are dead, they won't be billionaires any longer. Because the only thing that made them that way was the "superior" system of government that allowed it. You want to bet that the "system" will survive by sending our best jobs overseas? In that case, you are swimming against the tide of history, but hey, what does history have to do with it? All the kids are taking business now.


PS Christine is home and asking for her valentine. I told her it is tied up at the docks on one of those ships from China that can't unload. Guess how far I got with that? So, I had better take her out to dinner, but yes, you have been great valentines, and I salute you!


Alfred - cheaper is good enough for me - assuming the same quality.  If it is inferior, don't buy it.  Nobody is forcing you to buy any product --- oh except for Obama forcing you to buy insurance. 

Now go take care of Christine.


Let's try to return to something I pointed out earlier. 

Let's hear some comments -- rational comments -- on the information in graphs in this article.  How can we possibly justify the personal emissions of each of us Americans?

(I couldn't copy the graph, so here's the link to the entire article again)

http://www.wri.org/blog/2014/11/numbers-china-us-climate-agreement

And the Slate article  -- but please don't coment until after reading the entire article.

http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2014/11/obama_s...

Don't try dodging again.


Let's try to return to something I pointed out earlier. 


Great post, Alfred.  Exactly what I've been clumsily trying to say.  Green Energy -- Clean Coal, both great propaganda  trying to sell something to gullible people.

Have a fine dinner with your valentine!


How can we possibly justify the personal emissions of each of us Americans?

Why is justification needed?

Let's hear some comments -- rational comments -- on the information in graphs in this article.

Apparently you didn't read the article.  There is no "information" it is all conjecture and supposition as admitted by the author.

 

PS- still waiting for my "mistakes".

 


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.