A $25 Hike At Mesa Verde National Park

It will cost you $25 to visit Mug House, but the experience is worth it. Kurt Repanshek photo.

For $25, you can drive into Yellowstone or Yosemite national parks, your car loaded with family, and spend the rest of the week exploring. At Mesa Verde National Park, the park's entrance fee is $15 per vehicle, but experiencing this incredible park can become much more costly much more quickly.

For instance, if you want to go off the well-worn path and explore some cliff dwellings that are not normally open, you'll need to pay $25 for that experience. And $25 for your spouse, and $25 each for any children who tag along on the two-hour ranger-led hike to either Mug House or Square Tower House. So if you brought along your spouse and two kids, it'll cost $100 for your entire family to visit those intriguing cliff dwellings.

That $25 per person fee is more than eight times the $3 you pay to join rangers in climbing a ladder up into Balcony House, walking through Cliff Palace, or to ride a tram to Long House so you can climb up its ladders and gaze into its kivas.

And yet, according to Park Service officials, that $25 fee is, at best, a break-even proposition to cover the costs the park incurs to make tours of Mug House and Square Tower House possible.

"The special tours that you referenced in your question are limited both in availability and capacity and, short of heavily subsidizing these tours with park base funds, we choose instead to charge a price that will generate adequate income to match our tour expenses," John Wessels, the director of the Park Service's Intermountain regional office told me when I asked about the fee.

Going Into The Attic

Though Mesa Verde has 600 cliff dwellings, visitors have largely been limited to touring Balcony House, Spruce Tree House, and Cliff Palace atop Chapin Mesa. Some exceptions have cropped up in recent years, as the Park Service looked for ways to bring small groups of visitors to some other sites, such as Mug House and Square Tower House. (For details of this summer's tours, click here.)

This is the third summer for these special tours, which, in a sense, are not unlike going up into your attic and dusting off long-forgotten treasures from the past. And really, it's both amazing and unfortunate that while there are hundreds of cliff dwellings within Mesa Verde's boundaries, just five -- Cliff Palace, Balcony House, Spruce House, Long House and Step House -- have been open on a regular basis for visitors.

Maps of the mesas included within the national park's boundaries are dotted with ruins -- Double House, Sun Point Pueblo, Square Tower House, Sun Temple, Fire Temple, Cedar Tree House, Kodak House, and Jug House. And those are just the ones with names. There also are sites denoted simply by numbers -- 1644, 1645, 1676, 1452, 1801, 1291, and 1595 just to name a few.

The problem of opening more than the five named above to the public, of course, has been a lack of money and manpower. Money to both stabilize ruins enough so they can be toured, and manpower to provide the tours and perform the ongoing stabilization work. And then, too, there's the issue of access. Some sites are just too remote and difficult to reach to make public tours realistic. And that's unfortunate.

A visit to Mesa Verde provides keen insights into how the ancestral Puebloans lived; how they built their homes high in alcoves for protection and yet farmed on the surrounding plateaus, for instance. In some cases they would climb down to the canyon floor and then go up the other canyon wall to reach their gardens. They also were masters at irrigating their gardens, and remnants of check dams can still be found on Wetherill Mesa.

Folks who can afford the short hike to visit Mug House won't be disappointed. While the park's main dwellings that are accessible to visitors have been restored, Mug House has had only minor stabilization work done to it down through the decades. That much of the complex is still intact after all these centuries is a testament to the building skills of the ancestral Puebloans.

Mug House was named for several mugs that were found tied together when the five Wetherill brothers, who pioneered much of the initial archaeological work at Mesa Verde in the late 19th century, and Charles Mason, a brother-in-law, ventured into the dwelling around 1890.

"It appeared as though the people had been frightened away with no opportunity to carry anything with them," Mr. Mason went on to note in his observations. "All seemed to have been left just where it had been used last. No house in Mesa Verde yielded so much in proportion to size."

Today the mugs are gone from the dwelling, of course, but you still can peer into the kivas and rooms, see the smoke stains that cling to the sandstone alcove ceilings, gaze out over Rock Canyon, and simply stand in the quiet envisioning the sounds of laughing children and adults at work building fires or making pottery.

How Park Officials Arrived At That $25 Ticket Price

The $25 ticket price, park officials explained to me, is necessary to cover an array of expenses they incur in temporarily opening these sites.

Alternate Text
Square Tower House. Kurt Repanshek photo.

For instance, along with the ranger(s) needed to lead these treks, the park assigns at least two archaeologists to visit the sites at the start of the season to ensure visitor and site safety, and then again one or two times a month to assess any impacts. A natural resource employee also is sent to the sites to mark any endangered plants so they aren't trampled, and this individual also returns once or twice a month to determine if there have been any impacts from the special tours. In addition, two workers from the park's stabilization crew check the sites before the season to make sure they're safe for visitors, and then at least four members of the trails crew must go out to make any needed trail repairs, mark the end of the trail so visitors don't go farther than they should, and to ensure the trails are ready for traffic. At season's end these staff return to the sites to ready them for winter.

In all, explained Betty Lieurance, the park's administrative assistant, 402 hours of staff time are required each year to make these tours possible. As the average wage of these employees is $22.35 per hour, with benefits pushing that to $27.12, the tours' cost to the park is nearly $11,000.

"The price of the ticket is based on 70 percent sale of the tickets because the tours still go whether or not they are full. Based on 70 percent, we would take in $12,950," Ms. Lieurance said.

Add in the cost of vehicles and gas to get the visitors to the trails leading to the ruins, and the $3 per ticket the park pays the company that runs the ticket reservation system, and the park breaks even, at best, on the costs of offering these tours, she explained.

While all tours at Mesa Verde generated $775,000 last year, costs for running those tours amounted to $756,000. The remaining $19,000 was returned to the U.S. Treasury. While that $19,000 theoretically could have gone to reducing that $25 ticket price, by law the park is required to return at season's end any surplus revenues it might take in from all ticketed tours. Trying to guesstimate at the start of a season whether a surplus might arise at the end of the season is difficult at best.

"If we spend more than we take in, that money comes out of our base and may cut in to other park programs," Ms. Lieurance said. "If we spend less than we take in, we return it to the Department of Treasury in Washington D.C. As you can see, it is a gamble, since we have no way of knowing how many tickets will be sold or if we will be able to cover our costs."

There seemingly is little question that parks are strapped for operating funds, and have to try to cover their costs when offering some programs, particularly special programs such as the tours to Mug House and Square Tower House. Gamble that it might be, it's unfortunate that Mesa Verde can't retain any surplus ticket revenues at season's end to help offset the costs of these special tours the following year, for visiting these sites is a great experience.

Comments

We visted Mesa Verde NP twice in the past 12 months, and we're NOT local. We just took both of these hikes - Square House and Mug House - last week. It was worth every penny. Hiking over boulders, down paths, up & down, squeezing thru a cleft between a cliff and humongous fallen boulder where your back is flat against the wall. Can't get any better than this.

We support the Mesa Verde Institute and the NP - the rangers are great and the tours fantastic. When there are just 10 people on a tour, it's awesome. Highly recommended.

Glad to hear you had a great time, Carol. It's been a while since I was given a tour of Mug House, but the memory still rings fresh! In some aspects, the fact of being somewhat off the beaten path in the park adds to the experience.

It's great that the park offers this option. After the description and above comments, I will certainly put it on my wish list for the next time I'm in that part of the country. And it makes sense to me that such a venture should be set up on a cost-recovery basis. To have the cost subsidized and paid for by people who aren't getting the benefit of the experience seems inane. So congrats to Mesa Verde National Park for finding a way to offer this option without charging those who don't get to see it.

If anyone wants these "special tours", they are announced in the spring on the Mesa Verde Institute website. I bugged them until the day they put them online for booking. We also took the Yucca House tour last year [free - unexcavated archeologcal site outside Cortez] ... very very interesting and worth the $0.00 fee. LOL

If you are being taken on a guided hike to a resource that is not normally open to the public, there should be a larger fee involved. I would also like to see that increased fee go directly to the management of that resource.

I also have no problem with the cost of these tours. It sounds like the Park Service put some thought into setting the $25 fee, and they aren't trying to rip off the public or charge an excess amount to fund other programs. And after all, it's a matter a choice whether someone goes on these tours or not, and they choose to pay the $25 to take the tour. I would be more than willing to pay the fee to see these sites, and I probably will take one of these tours next time I visit Mesa Verde, since I've now taken all the conventional tours. For those who can't afford it, there are still lower price options available in the park to take their families to see.

When you start piling on family members this can get steep in a hurry but I think to see something as historic and isolated as these sites are it would be worth it. I'd love to take one of these tours someday.

It's simply incorrect that Mesa Verde can't keep excess revenue within the Park. That's one of the key tenets of the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act - each Park can keep the revenue from entrance fees, interagency pass sales, and interpretive program fees. Not only can they keep it, but that ability is the main reason there's been such a steep increase in entrance fees since 1997 and the proliferation of extra fees even after you've gained entrance.

It's dismaying that so many have forgotten that the purpose of National Parks is to preserve the resources and provide for their enjoyment, not to make a profit nor even to cover expenses. Of course visitation to these remote and fragile sites needs to be limited, but money should not be the determining factor as to who gets to go and who doesn't. Seems the Parks are back to being what they were in the early days - places where only the wealthy have access.

For $25 I would expect to be carried in a sedan chair:

http://onelondonone.blogspot.com/2012/03/sedan-chairs.html

I consider this a scandal, along with other fee based activities in other parks, including nominal fees of $3 or the like or those in the middle ground such as the 10$ for the fiery furnace tour in Arches NP. The National Park System is not "pay per view".

Either it is part of the mandate of the park to give access to some part of the park, then it is their duty to make it possible. Or they don't want to or can't under current conditions, well, then there is no access.

A 3$ fee is a bad joke anyway, because handling such a fee induces more costs than it brings in. A 25$ fee is an insult, because it seriously limits the availability of the offered tour thus reducing the economy of scales. 11.000$ a season as flat costs is irrrelevant, if the park can't cover that from their budget, get a corporate or private sponsor.

Many years ago, I did the balcony house tour (then still free), and really loved the opportunity to climb the ladder and walk the ruins.

I think this is a fine comprimise. I understand the problems fees can cause some. Honestly though $25 for special hikes when many other hikes are open (granted Mesa Verde has fewer just walking around hikes than other places) is fine.

I see a much much bigger problem the failure to manage the adverse impact of careless and inconsiderate visitors that damage parks use for those later. If it takes more fees to keep the parks up, so be it.

Seems like a resonable fee to me-- I'll gladly pay it .

But MRC, isn't this exactly what the folks who want to drown government in a bathtub want? Isn't this part of the "pay your own way" ethic that is espoused as "personal responsibility" by those who call themselves "conservatives."

Isn't anyone who opposes this kind of thing quickly labled as a "liberal socialist" by those on that side of the aisle?

Be careful. You might get a bad name out there.

And as for finding corporate or private sponsors -- when was the last time you took your family to Disney World or some other private or corporate "park?" This is a real bargain compared to a day at one of those places.

Actually, Anonymous on June 7 is incorrect about the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act. Although the park can collect and keep entrance fees, user fees (hikes, campground fees, etc.) are to be returned to the Treasury if not spent on cost recovery for the service provided.


And as for finding corporate or private sponsors -- when was the last time you took your family to Disney World or some other private or corporate "park?" This is a real bargain compared to a day at one of those places


Yeah those nasty corporations do such a terrible job. Thats why Disney World had "only" 45 million visitors in 2010 versus Mesa Verde's 559,000.