National Park Service Reviewing West Virginia Site For Possible National Park and Preserve

Blackwater Falls State Park in West Virginia could become part of a proposed national park. Stock image from Bigstock Photo.

Over the years there has been passing interest in adding a wild and scenic corner of West Virginia to the National Park System, and in the coming weeks the National Park Service will begin to take a look to see if the area in question is suitable for inclusion.

Most of the lands being surveyed fall within the Monongahela and George Washington national forests in the eastern part of the state, while some currently lie within state parks.

Perhaps it's not a surprise that there's some opposition to the proposal. Hunting groups see talk of a High Allegheny National Park as a move that will shut them out of some of their favorite hunting areas.

"The National Park Service is eyeing important hunting lands for inclusion in a large new West Virginia park unit. Apparently the agency is looking at establishing this new unit – the High Allegheny National Park — in the Allegheny Mountains of eastern West Virginia," wrote Bill Horn, director of federal affairs for the U.S. Sportsmen's Alliance, in an early December blog entry.

"Most of the land under review is presently part of the Monongahela National Forest and Canaan Valley National Wildlife Refuge – both of which have long hunting traditions," he went on. "Hunters and anglers need to watch this park study, and NPS, like a hawk. The agency is historically hostile to hunters, becoming increasingly hostile to anglers, and is flat out opposed to wildlife and habitat management (both activities are important on Forest and Refuge lands). Plus, almost all NPS units are 'parks' where hunting is prohibited. Having NPS take over management of wonderful hunting areas within the forest, like Spruce Knob and Dolly Sods, sends shivers down this hunter’s spine."

But Mr. Horn, and others who have criticized the consideration of a national park for West Virginia, are jumping the gun, says Judy Rodd, executive director of Friends of Blackwater Canyon and a driving force behind Friends of High Allegeheny National Park & Preserve.

Within the National Park System are many "preserves" where hunting is allowed, Ms. Rodd noted.

“We’ve always said 'park and preserve.' Probably the largest part would be in the preserve status," she said, adding, quickly, that "it’s premature to say we could even have a park.”

Right now the Park Service has only agreed, at the request of U.S. Sen. Joe Manchin, D-West Virginia, to conduct an initial survey to see the landscape and what is contained within, Ms. Rodd said.

“Is this feasible? Is it worthy? Do we have the right stuff?” she said. As discussions around those questions take place, Ms. Rodd added, "We want the hunters at the table, we want the kayakers, we want the bikers.”

West Virginia is an incredibly beautiful state, and one with rich cultural and American history, too. After all, the state was cleaved from Virginia "out of the crucible of the Civil War," and there are many traces of both the Civil War, the Revolutionary War, and the French and Indian War in the state, notes Ms. Rodd. Some of these sites could be touched, directly or indirectly, through a national park, she said.

“We envision that the Park Service could promote” Civil War tourism in the area, said Ms. Rodd. "You could enhance visitorship to a lot of parts that aren’t owned by the federal government but which would benefit.”

Last February the Friends of Blackwater Canyon discussed a High Allegheny National Park that might be as large as 750,000 acres and could encompass not just Blackwater Falls State Park, but "the scenic grandeur of Dolly Sods, Canaan Valley, Spruce Knob, Seneca Rocks and the Blackwater Canyon. Some areas will be in the park and others buffered by the park."

Areas of the state that might be included in such a park, the group said, include:

• Magnificent Spruce Knob – the highest peak in West Virginia.

• Superlative Seneca Rocks – a sheer, 1000 foot rock face challenges climbers.

• Beloved Blackwater Falls – a West Virginia treasure, now open to the world.

• Awesome Otter Creek Wilderness – a pristine mountain stream valley.

• Spectacular Smoke Hole – a series of fascinating caves along the Potomac’s South Branch

• Cherished Canaan Valley National Wildlife Refuge - the gem of the Valley.

• Distinguished Dolly Sods – Canadian tundra and heath amid superlative, wild landscapes.

At the same time, work currently is under way in West Virginia to blaze a new highway east to west across this general area, and there are concerns about how that project, and the increased traffic, might impact the area.

"I think the preservation of the history is not happening at all. One of the things about West Virginia, because the terrain has been so difficult, we are not overrun with a lot of stuff. We’ve just been lucky. Why would you build a McDonald's when you’re going to get 10 people a day?" said Ms. Rodd.

However, Corridor H will "just make it easier for lots of people to come. Now we have to think about preserving these landscapes," she said. "Another part of our proposal that could help with an issue like that is having a Heritage Area layer on top of the park and the private lands. There are lots of private lands. If you had a Heritage Area you could encourage, through a funding mechanism, preservation of private lands.”

At Sen. Manchin's request, the Park Service will conduct a Reconnaissance Study of the general area to see if it merits a more detailed resource evaluation for possible inclusion into the park system.

"It's the first, most informal and highest in the clouds quick overview of the resources and making both some decisions on whether the resources are likely to meet the criteria for new parkland," Allen Cooper, the chief of park planning and special studies for the Park Service's Northeast Region, said of the reconnaissance study.

"The area that the senator has asked us to look at is fairly large and rich in resources," Mr. Cooper said. "We will take an overview that will take about a year, start to finish, to identify resources, to talk to some of the principal stakeholders in the survey area, to share information. Basically, it's a way for them to share their information and knowledge about the resources.”

Part of the study, which could cost upwards of $25,000, would determine whether similar resources already exist within the park system, said Mr. Cooper.

"If the survey finds that it (the proposed landscape) is likely to meet the criteria, we will be using the results to refine the area that might be defined in the Special Resource Study," he said, adding that the agency would only conduct the more intensive resource study if Congress directed it to via specific legislation.

“The Special Resource Study usually takes a couple of years, is authorized by legislation," he said. “The Reconnaissance Survey is to screen out the things that are unlikely to meet the criteria if you go to the full resource study.”

While the upcoming survey hasn't received much attention beyond the Mountain State, inside West Virginia it has generated much discussion and debate. Among the concerns raised is that national park designation could remove from the public landscape lands now open to hunters.

Media in the state have reported that Sen. Manchin "would never support legislation that might curb hunting" and envisions the area as a national preserve, with hunting allowed, "but not as a full-fledged national park."

Back at the Park Service, Mr. Cooper said if the agency does a full-blown special resource study, that document would "recommend" what designation might best fit the area.

“The Park Service reserves the right, regardless of what the (congressional) request specifically asks for, we reserve the right to recommend what kind of unit it might meet the criteria for," he said "We would certainly evaluate it as what the request requested, but if there’s something that’s more appropriate, that fits the bill better, we can recommend that it be studied as it goes forward.”

Traveler postscript: To learn more about the High Allegheny initiative, visit this website.

Comments

"We’ve always said 'park and preserve.' Probably the largest part would be in the preserve status," she said, adding, quickly, that "it’s premature to say we could even have a park."
That statement set the warning bells a-ringing. We always said Cape Hatteras National Seashore and Recreation Area until NPS started closing large areas to horses, dogs, families with children, fisherman, windsurfers, pedistrians of all types and vehicles in an effort to encourage the birds and turtles to use the most popular areas as a hatchery. Now the NPS just says Cape Hatteras National Seashore. Comments about that are dismissed as being an "administrative term".
How does one trap a wild hog? First you scatter food on the ground. When the hog is used to coming there for food, you erect a single line of fencing. When the hog ignores the single line of fencing, you erect a second line. And then a third and a fourth with a gate. When the hog is used to going inside the gate for food, you close the gate.
Many of the areas identified are already under public control to prevent commercial development and seem to be doing just fine.
Yes, watch this one very, very carefully.


As a former West Virginian, I was devastated to re-learn how many poachers continue to
dis-respect wildlife and wildlife laws since there is virtually no wildlife law enforcement.
Any actual national park designation will have the poacher, career-felon residents to cope with
even in those sectors of no hunting. I was amazed to see families hiking trails in the Dolly Sods
area with poacher-hunters shooting all around as though this were the darkest regions of tribal
Africa. The NRA and other poacher endorsers will make certain no national park is designated without
hunting which in their minds means poaching at any time, anywhere !

" The NRA and other poacher endorsers"
Anon - Could you please show us where the NRA has endorsed poaching?

Having visited this area regularly since I was too young to remember, I'm not sure how I feel about this. For one thing, on a weekday in early June in the morning, you can visit all the iconic sites in Blackwater Falls SP and be alone. Same can be said for some of my favorite spots in Canaan Valley NWR and Bear Rocks in Dolly Sods. I suppose the highway will ruin that experience before the National Park would anyway. And who am I to say that my ability to enjoy that solitude is what's best for the land? The fact that there aren't many people visiting in Spring could be beneficial to the cause of those who would rather develop than preserve the natural spectacle.
It would be a thrill to see NPS signs and NPS rangers patrolling a place I love so much, just because the parks have been icons of natural beauty to me. On the other hand, Blackwater Falls today looks much like it did when I frist remember going there in 1978, and I like that. As I said, I'm of multiple minds on this. The venomous rhetoric that's sure to ensue will have little effect on my opinion, except perhaps to marginalize its issuers and their respective cause in my mind.

The NRA promotes carrying loaded weapons in national parks where visitors have the expectation of
not being shot by some "avid hunter in disguise supposedly defending himself from any predator": visit:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-markarian/nra-off-target-in-protect_b_205449.html
The illegal shooting, trapping, or taking of game or fish from private or public property.The poaching of game and fish was made a crime in England in the seventeenth century, as aristocratic landowners sought to preserve their shooting and property rights. Poor peasants did most of the poaching to supplement their diets with meat and fish.In the United States, poaching was not considered a serious problem meriting legal measures before the twentieth century, because vast expanses of undeveloped land contained abundant sources of fish and game. The increased cultivation of land and the growth of towns and cities reduced wildlife habitats in the twentieth century. In the early 1900s, the U.S. conservation movement arose with an emphasis on preserving wildlife and managing the fish and game populations. Wildlife preserves and state and national parks were created as havens for wild animals, many of which were threatened with extinction.Because of these changing circumstances, restrictions were placed on hunting and fishing. State game and fish laws now require persons to purchase licenses to hunt and fish. The terms of these licenses limit the kind and number of animals or fish that may be taken and restrict hunting and fishing to designated times of the year, popularly referred to as hunting and fishing seasons.Therefore, persons who fail to purchase a license, as well as those who violate the terms of their licenses, commit acts of poaching. Most poaching in the United States is done for sport or commercial profit. Rare and endangered species, which are protected by state and federal law, are often the targets of poachers.Poaching laws are enforced by game wardens, who patrol state and national parks and respond to violations on private property. Poachers are subject to criminal laws, ranging from misdemeanors to felonies. Penalties may include steep fines, jail sentences, the Forfeiture of any poached game or fish, the loss of hunting and fishing license privileges for several years, and the forfeiture of hunting or fishing equipment, boats, and vehicles used in the poaching.Cross-referencesEndangered Species Act; Environmental Law; Fish and Fishing.West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved

I've been looking at photos of the area and it looks wonderful. Having Shenandoah and a potential new National Park and Preserve near each other can only benefit the area

Anon,
The NRA promotes the 2nd Amendment. There is nothing they do that encourages poaching. Your comment was pure hyperbola with no basis in fact.

No, ecbuck, the NRA promotes its interpretation of the 2nd Amendment.

Rick Smith: As opposed to your interpretation? What would be the differences, Rick? Could it be the culture has declined to such an extent that the original intent (and culture) has been bastardized by pop culture/liberal direction with the deteriation of grounding?

It's interpretation?


A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state,
the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
There isn't much to interpret. Nor is there anything the NRA does that "promotes poaching".

Let's change one word: "Could it be the culture has declined to such an extent that the original
intent (and culture) has been bastardized by pop culture/conservative
direction with the deteriation of grounding?"

I do have one question, though. What the heck does "deteriation" mean. Couldn't find it in my dictionary.

Ha, Lee, check your dictionary further, lol. I believe you'll find that pop culture and Liberal have more similarities than conservative. Direct opposites in my library but no doubt you are much more learned than I. Try and convince me the country has gotten more conservative especially in the areas of the National Park Service and big government in general. Hard to accept ... like a hole in a boat until your feet get wet:). Respectfully

Lee: You saying spelling trumps common sense? Always fun discussing things with scholarly types, lol. "Deteriorate" or deteriorating is what is happening to the country and it's not because we didn't spend twice as much stimulus.
Vive the wild places! Get rid of the elitest buerocrats.

If you look New River Gorge National River and Gauley National Recreation Area (both in WV) you will see both allow hunting and fishing. In fact when I lived there the Parks were becoming some of the few public hunting areas left. Hunting clubs and private owners were tying up much of the land. Rangers and management at that time seemed to be pro hunting.

Seems fine the way it is! NPS is just gonna bring more crowds and ruin it for all.
Doesn't have anything to do with how the land is used now. Hunter or Hippy, we all go to CV get away from the Resort (WISP) and NPS (Shennendoah) crowd.
Thanks but no thanks NPS!

Agree entirely. If this idea does go anywhere, be sure to stay tuned to public comment periods so can comment and strongly oppose. Wilderness and NWR are the most protective uses of federal land and largely what we now have. A national park must by law promote much more human activity and will destroy these areas. Leave it as is, those who take the time and effort already do so.

As a National Park employee for 27 years (and a West Virginia State Park superintendent for seven before that), I've never seen the statuatory requirement that "A national park must by law promote much more human activity and will destroy these areas." Could someone cite that for me?
I am a native West Virginian, a current WV landowner who allows hunting, a former WV State Park manager, and deeply love the area in question. There are good arguments for and against this proposal, but let's keep them to the facts and away from the emotion or sound bites of the current political campaigns.

I would like to here form the NPS on what benefits would accrue from changing the status from National Forest to National Park. In my limited view point and living outside the state of WV it just means I will then be paying to enter these areas that I have been visiting for free! It also means I will need to fill out camping permits; and that I half to be out of the park by dark if I don’t have a permit or be fined. I don’t need or want park visitor centers and the services they provide. West Virginia slogan is “Wild and Wonderful[= 10pt; font-family: Arial; background-color: #f9f9f9; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial]”[/] if the land is tamed to be a National Park with gated pay booth entrances and visitor centers every where, the State better change it’s slogan to “The Tamed and Wonderful”.